Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19133268 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Operator-based frameworks for biological dynamics have recently introduced reduced state-space representations in which instability can be quantified through a scalar functional ∆Φ(t) relative to a reference stability manifold. While such approaches enable early-warning detection of regime transitions, they do not specify how detected instability can be systematically mapped to controlled perturbations. In this work, we introduce a conservative intervention-mapping framework formulated in a reduced Information–Coherence–Energy (ICE) state space. System dynamics are represented by x(t) = (E,I,C), and instability is defined as a scalar functional ∆Φ(t) measuring deviation from a reference state x∗. We define admissible perturbations u(t) and pose the intervention problem as the identification of inputs that reproducibly reduce ∆Φ(t) under controlled and testable conditions. The framework is formulated in a control-theoretic setting, including Lyapunov-like decrease criteria and explicitly defined intervention classes. It does not assume universal controllability or therapeutic efficacy. Instead, it establishes a falsifiable bridge between instability detection and candidate stabilization mechanisms in biological dynamical systems. The primary contribution is the definition of a minimal, experimentally testable structure for evaluating whether consistent intervention mappings exist across systems.</p>