FIGURE 2 in Consideration of range-wide variation is critical when splitting widely distributed species: the case of the proposed Iguana melanoderma

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Den Burg, Matthijs P., Queiroz, Kevin De, Ventayol, Marina, Debrot, Adolphe O., Malone, Catherine L.
Formato: Recurso digital
Publicado: Zenodo 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901584514908160
author Van Den Burg, Matthijs P.
Queiroz, Kevin De
Ventayol, Marina
Debrot, Adolphe O.
Malone, Catherine L.
author_facet Van Den Burg, Matthijs P.
Queiroz, Kevin De
Ventayol, Marina
Debrot, Adolphe O.
Malone, Catherine L.
contents FIGURE 2. Estimated mtDNA ND4 phylogeny for the Iguana iguana species complex. Numbers above branches are the estimated nucleotide substitutions (converted from ML substitutions per site) and bootstrap support for nodes is indicated below, when> 0.70. The four color-coded clades are those previously identified within the I. iguana species complex (Stephen et al. 2013). Taxonomy for the I. iguana species complex follows ITWG (2016, 2022). Bold and underlined locality codes indicate samples assigned to I. melanoderma by Breuil et al. (2020); A and B indicate: Subclade A, the smallest subclade including all haplotypes previously referred to the proposed I. melanoderma and Subclade B, the largest subclade including those haplotypes and excluding all haplotypes previously referred to species other than the proposed I. melanoderma. Locality codes marked with asterisks indicate sequences generated in the current study.
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19168658
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle FIGURE 2 in Consideration of range-wide variation is critical when splitting widely distributed species: the case of the proposed Iguana melanoderma
Van Den Burg, Matthijs P.
Queiroz, Kevin De
Ventayol, Marina
Debrot, Adolphe O.
Malone, Catherine L.
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
FIGURE 2. Estimated mtDNA ND4 phylogeny for the Iguana iguana species complex. Numbers above branches are the estimated nucleotide substitutions (converted from ML substitutions per site) and bootstrap support for nodes is indicated below, when> 0.70. The four color-coded clades are those previously identified within the I. iguana species complex (Stephen et al. 2013). Taxonomy for the I. iguana species complex follows ITWG (2016, 2022). Bold and underlined locality codes indicate samples assigned to I. melanoderma by Breuil et al. (2020); A and B indicate: Subclade A, the smallest subclade including all haplotypes previously referred to the proposed I. melanoderma and Subclade B, the largest subclade including those haplotypes and excluding all haplotypes previously referred to species other than the proposed I. melanoderma. Locality codes marked with asterisks indicate sequences generated in the current study.
title FIGURE 2 in Consideration of range-wide variation is critical when splitting widely distributed species: the case of the proposed Iguana melanoderma
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19168658