Is manual prophylaxis more or less effective than ultrasonic prophylaxis for removing plaque and calculus in patients requiring dental prophylaxis?

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Tripdatabase
Natura: Recurso digital
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866901112464867328
author Tripdatabase
author_facet Tripdatabase
contents Manual and ultrasonic prophylaxis are both effective for dental plaque and calculus removal, with each offering specific benefits and limitations. Further studies may help clarify differences in efficacy regarding calculus removal and tissue trauma.
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19195495
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Is manual prophylaxis more or less effective than ultrasonic prophylaxis for removing plaque and calculus in patients requiring dental prophylaxis?
Tripdatabase
dental prophylaxis
manual prophylaxis
ultrasonic prophylaxis
plaque removal
calculus removal
dental care
oral health
Manual and ultrasonic prophylaxis are both effective for dental plaque and calculus removal, with each offering specific benefits and limitations. Further studies may help clarify differences in efficacy regarding calculus removal and tissue trauma.
title Is manual prophylaxis more or less effective than ultrasonic prophylaxis for removing plaque and calculus in patients requiring dental prophylaxis?
topic dental prophylaxis
manual prophylaxis
ultrasonic prophylaxis
plaque removal
calculus removal
dental care
oral health
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19195495