INFLOW Derivation: Can Energy Flux Through the Brane Be Derived from P2 + P3?
Fuente:
Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866901189076975616 |
|---|---|
| author | Grčman, Igor |
| author_facet | Grčman, Igor |
| contents | <p>The Scanning Kinematics derivation showed that the brane equation of motion (□<span>g</span>Ξ = 0) admits both static and propagating solutions, and that INFLOW acts as the boundary condition selecting the propagating branch. INFLOW was left as <span>[P-nova] </span>— a hypothesis, not a derivation.</p> <p>This document attempts to derive INFLOW from the existing EDC postulates P2 (thick brane, S<span>1</span><span>ξ </span>compact) and P3 (ρ<span>5</span>M<span>≫ρ</span>4<span>M</span>). The central argument: P3 creates an asymmetric pressure across the brane in the ξ direction. Since the brane’s normal is ∂/∂ξ and S<span>1</span><span>ξ </span>is compact, this pressure gradient drives perpetual motion of the brane along S<span>1</span><span>ξ </span>— which is INFLOW.</p> <p>If successful, the entire scanning chain upgrades from <span>[Der]</span>|<span>[P-nova] </span>to <span>[Der]</span>|P, and Paper 12 reduces to three postulates (P1, P2, P3) →four forces.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19199242 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | INFLOW Derivation: Can Energy Flux Through the Brane Be Derived from P2 + P3? Grčman, Igor Elastic Diffusive Cosmology INFLOW mechanism brane pressure energy asymmetry Plenum-to-Observer flow no static equilibrium brane propagation <p>The Scanning Kinematics derivation showed that the brane equation of motion (□<span>g</span>Ξ = 0) admits both static and propagating solutions, and that INFLOW acts as the boundary condition selecting the propagating branch. INFLOW was left as <span>[P-nova] </span>— a hypothesis, not a derivation.</p> <p>This document attempts to derive INFLOW from the existing EDC postulates P2 (thick brane, S<span>1</span><span>ξ </span>compact) and P3 (ρ<span>5</span>M<span>≫ρ</span>4<span>M</span>). The central argument: P3 creates an asymmetric pressure across the brane in the ξ direction. Since the brane’s normal is ∂/∂ξ and S<span>1</span><span>ξ </span>is compact, this pressure gradient drives perpetual motion of the brane along S<span>1</span><span>ξ </span>— which is INFLOW.</p> <p>If successful, the entire scanning chain upgrades from <span>[Der]</span>|<span>[P-nova] </span>to <span>[Der]</span>|P, and Paper 12 reduces to three postulates (P1, P2, P3) →four forces.</p> |
| title | INFLOW Derivation: Can Energy Flux Through the Brane Be Derived from P2 + P3? |
| topic | Elastic Diffusive Cosmology INFLOW mechanism brane pressure energy asymmetry Plenum-to-Observer flow no static equilibrium brane propagation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19199242 |