NETJERU Cycle 1 — AI Capital Reallocation as Symbolic Architecture Crisis

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: vondoom, anthony
Format: Recurso digital
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2026
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901096988934144
author vondoom, anthony
author_facet vondoom, anthony
contents <p><em>This paper presents the output of NETJERU Cycle 1 — the first live run of the DSSM-compliant multi-agent intelligence system introduced in Working Paper 4</em><em><span lang="EN-US">2</span>. The primary signal detected by Isis and scored by Thoth concerns the structural reallocation of global capital from talent arbitrage to automation-first investment models, and its implications for the symbolic legitimacy architecture of global knowledge-work governance. Thoth's initial scores ranged from 6.2 to 8.1 across four DSSM detection domains. Set's adversarial probes reduced two scores and identified a critical unresolved challenge: whether capital reallocation represents routine market evolution or genuine symbolic architecture crisis. The DSSM resolution distinguishes between rational reallocation and legitimate reallocation — establishing that the core risk is transition velocity exceeding the symbolic absorption capacity of existing governance frameworks, not irrationality per se. Osiris identified two high-confidence historical analogues: Roman bureaucratic fossilization (350–450 CE, match score 9.1/10) and the Nixon shock / Bretton Woods collapse (1971, match score 8.4/10). The paper derives four DSSM prescriptions centred on the establishment of an International AI Governance Coordination Council (AIGCC) as symbolic architecture — not regulatory body — designed to establish legitimacy before infrastructure and include peripheral actors before any coordination mechanism is built. Osiris's forward watch identifies four measurable signals to track over the next 30–365 days as empirical tests of the DSSM's predictive validity on this domain.</em></p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19206992
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle NETJERU Cycle 1 — AI Capital Reallocation as Symbolic Architecture Crisis
vondoom, anthony
<p><em>This paper presents the output of NETJERU Cycle 1 — the first live run of the DSSM-compliant multi-agent intelligence system introduced in Working Paper 4</em><em><span lang="EN-US">2</span>. The primary signal detected by Isis and scored by Thoth concerns the structural reallocation of global capital from talent arbitrage to automation-first investment models, and its implications for the symbolic legitimacy architecture of global knowledge-work governance. Thoth's initial scores ranged from 6.2 to 8.1 across four DSSM detection domains. Set's adversarial probes reduced two scores and identified a critical unresolved challenge: whether capital reallocation represents routine market evolution or genuine symbolic architecture crisis. The DSSM resolution distinguishes between rational reallocation and legitimate reallocation — establishing that the core risk is transition velocity exceeding the symbolic absorption capacity of existing governance frameworks, not irrationality per se. Osiris identified two high-confidence historical analogues: Roman bureaucratic fossilization (350–450 CE, match score 9.1/10) and the Nixon shock / Bretton Woods collapse (1971, match score 8.4/10). The paper derives four DSSM prescriptions centred on the establishment of an International AI Governance Coordination Council (AIGCC) as symbolic architecture — not regulatory body — designed to establish legitimacy before infrastructure and include peripheral actors before any coordination mechanism is built. Osiris's forward watch identifies four measurable signals to track over the next 30–365 days as empirical tests of the DSSM's predictive validity on this domain.</em></p>
title NETJERU Cycle 1 — AI Capital Reallocation as Symbolic Architecture Crisis
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19206992