Superposition Does Not Imply Duplication: An Admissibility Analysis of Quantum Scaling Claims

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Paton, Andrew John
Natura: Recurso digital
Lingua:inglese
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866901076900315136
author Paton, Andrew John
author_facet Paton, Andrew John
contents <p>Recent interpretations of quantum mechanics suggest that particles existing in superposition occupy multiple locations simultaneously in a manner that could scale to macroscopic or cosmological effects. This paper applies the Paton Admissibility Framework to clarify the distinction between unresolved quantum states and resolved observational instances. It is shown that superposition represents a pre-datum condition and does not constitute duplication within resolved space. Claims that such behaviour implies multiverse interaction or large-scale instability are identified as misclassifications arising from failure to apply admissibility constraints. The result is a structural clarification: superposition does not imply duplication, and unresolved states do not support ontological escalation.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19212525
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Superposition Does Not Imply Duplication: An Admissibility Analysis of Quantum Scaling Claims
Paton, Andrew John
Admissibility Quantum mechanics Superposition Datum Observation Constraint based reasoning Paton System
<p>Recent interpretations of quantum mechanics suggest that particles existing in superposition occupy multiple locations simultaneously in a manner that could scale to macroscopic or cosmological effects. This paper applies the Paton Admissibility Framework to clarify the distinction between unresolved quantum states and resolved observational instances. It is shown that superposition represents a pre-datum condition and does not constitute duplication within resolved space. Claims that such behaviour implies multiverse interaction or large-scale instability are identified as misclassifications arising from failure to apply admissibility constraints. The result is a structural clarification: superposition does not imply duplication, and unresolved states do not support ontological escalation.</p>
title Superposition Does Not Imply Duplication: An Admissibility Analysis of Quantum Scaling Claims
topic Admissibility Quantum mechanics Superposition Datum Observation Constraint based reasoning Paton System
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212525