Structural Sovereignty: Geometry and Admissibility as the Two Halves of a Governable AI World

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Truong, Narnaiezzsshaa
Format: Recurso digital
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2026
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901464888115200
author Truong, Narnaiezzsshaa
author_facet Truong, Narnaiezzsshaa
contents <p>Sovereignty in multi-stakeholder AI systems is not a property of execution integrity or policy compliance. It is a structural condition defined by two orthogonal but inseparable halves: governance geometry, which identifies the surfaces that hardware and execution boundaries cannot govern, and admissibility conditions, which define the invariants that must hold before any execution is permitted. This paper unifies these two halves into a theoretical framework for structural sovereignty and proposes them as the foundation of a governance discipline distinct from behavioral alignment, execution integrity, and policy audit. The framework is model-agnostic, vendor-agnostic, and temporal.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19261587
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Structural Sovereignty: Geometry and Admissibility as the Two Halves of a Governable AI World
Truong, Narnaiezzsshaa
<p>Sovereignty in multi-stakeholder AI systems is not a property of execution integrity or policy compliance. It is a structural condition defined by two orthogonal but inseparable halves: governance geometry, which identifies the surfaces that hardware and execution boundaries cannot govern, and admissibility conditions, which define the invariants that must hold before any execution is permitted. This paper unifies these two halves into a theoretical framework for structural sovereignty and proposes them as the foundation of a governance discipline distinct from behavioral alignment, execution integrity, and policy audit. The framework is model-agnostic, vendor-agnostic, and temporal.</p>
title Structural Sovereignty: Geometry and Admissibility as the Two Halves of a Governable AI World
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19261587