Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kelly Rhys
Format: Recurso digital
Language:
Published: Zenodo 2026
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19262382
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • <div> <div> <div> <div> <div dir="auto"> <div> <div> <h2><span><strong>Summary</strong></span></h2> <p>HTDS-Ω (Hierarchical Transform-Driven Systems, Omega tier) is a formal scientific and computational governance framework for managing how patterns become authority-bearing signals within complex systems. Originally emerging from RNA structural inference work, HTDS reframes pattern discovery as a staged constitutional process in which signals must cross a rigorously defined promotion boundary before acquiring any governing force.</p> <p>The framework introduces a complete signal lifecycle architecture, including multi-chamber validation (Validation Tribunal), standing assignment, authority envelopes, lawful amplification, conflict arbitration, and post-promotion surveillance with reaffirmation. Crucially, HTDS embeds persistent weakness memory through a formal scar system and enforces full historical traceability via a constitutional ledger. Signals are not only admitted but continuously monitored, constrained, and, when necessary, suspended, revoked, or superseded through explicit constitutional transitions.</p> <p>This stack enables a shift from heuristic or performance-driven rule adoption to a governed model in which authority is conditional, bounded, and replayable. HTDS-Ω is designed to prevent silent drift, weak-signal tyranny, scope laundering, and structural corruption by enforcing invariants such as no implied authority, no promotion without burden, and no authority without ongoing proof.</p> <p>By integrating validation, governance, memory, and lifecycle control into a unified system, HTDS establishes a new paradigm for building reliable, interpretable, and evolution-capable intelligent systems. While developed in the context of RNA modeling and high-ambiguity scientific inference, the framework generalizes to any domain where patterns must transition into trusted operational rules under uncertainty and adversarial conditions.</p> <h2><span><strong>Keywords</strong></span></h2> <p>HTDS, signal governance, constitutional AI, rule promotion, lawful amplification, conflict arbitration, validation tribunal, multi-chamber validation, signal registry, constitutional ledger, scar system, weakness memory, post-promotion surveillance, reaffirmation, drift detection, authority envelope, standing model, rule lifecycle, supersession, revocation, suspension, interpretable AI, scientific inference systems, RNA modeling, ambiguity-preserving systems</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div> </div> <div> <div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div> </div>