The Ubiquity of Six: A 500-Hypothesis Survey of the Perfect Number Across All Sciences
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901084308504576 |
|---|---|
| author | Park, Min Woo |
| author_facet | Park, Min Woo |
| contents | We tested 500 hypotheses across 18 scientific domains asking whether the number 6 and sigma(6)=12 appear as structural constants beyond chance. 66 findings confirmed at GREEN level. Statistical significance: p < 10^-25. Three mathematical root theorems (2D kissing number, honeycomb theorem, sigma=tau(tau-1)) explain >60% of findings. A biology-to-mathematics mapping achieves 100% explanation rate. Anti-evidence (7-fold systems) maps to divisors of the second perfect number 28. |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19303850 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Ubiquity of Six: A 500-Hypothesis Survey of the Perfect Number Across All Sciences Park, Min Woo perfect numbers hexagonal symmetry kissing number crystallography molecular biology interdisciplinary number six statistical survey We tested 500 hypotheses across 18 scientific domains asking whether the number 6 and sigma(6)=12 appear as structural constants beyond chance. 66 findings confirmed at GREEN level. Statistical significance: p < 10^-25. Three mathematical root theorems (2D kissing number, honeycomb theorem, sigma=tau(tau-1)) explain >60% of findings. A biology-to-mathematics mapping achieves 100% explanation rate. Anti-evidence (7-fold systems) maps to divisors of the second perfect number 28. |
| title | The Ubiquity of Six: A 500-Hypothesis Survey of the Perfect Number Across All Sciences |
| topic | perfect numbers hexagonal symmetry kissing number crystallography molecular biology interdisciplinary number six statistical survey |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19303850 |