Documented Evaluation Structures: An Empirical Dataset Based on Requests for Criteria and Factual Grounds

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eines, Ekaterina
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901455411085312
author Eines, Ekaterina
author_facet Eines, Ekaterina
contents <p>This<em> dataset</em> provides a structured and descriptive account of written correspondence between the author and selected public administrative bodies in Norway during the period 2025–2026. It constitutes a documented empirical basis consisting of access requests and corresponding responses concerning evaluation criteria, factual grounds, and documentation of decision-making processes.</p> <p>The material is organised into units of analysis defined as request–response sequences, with follow-ups included where they contribute to clarifying the response. The presentation is limited to observable content and does not include interpretation or normative assessment.</p> <p>The dataset is structured using the Documented Evaluation Structures Model (DESM), which enables consistent description of document availability, stated grounds, operationalisation, and traceability across cases.</p> <p>The empirical material is analytically related to two publications based on the same underlying material: a Norwegian-language publication on documented criteria-lessness in public administration (Eines, 2026b), and an English-language analytical publication presenting empirically grounded observations of criteria-lessness in public administration (Eines, 2026f). The dataset may be described as providing the documented empirical basis for these analytical accounts.</p> <p><em>Version note:</em><br>Updated to include reference to a newly published English-language analytical publication based on the same material and to clarify the dataset’s role as the documented empirical basis.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19338514
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Documented Evaluation Structures: An Empirical Dataset Based on Requests for Criteria and Factual Grounds
Eines, Ekaterina
Criteriology; public administration; evaluation criteria; factual grounds; documentation; decision-making processes; empirical dataset
<p>This<em> dataset</em> provides a structured and descriptive account of written correspondence between the author and selected public administrative bodies in Norway during the period 2025–2026. It constitutes a documented empirical basis consisting of access requests and corresponding responses concerning evaluation criteria, factual grounds, and documentation of decision-making processes.</p> <p>The material is organised into units of analysis defined as request–response sequences, with follow-ups included where they contribute to clarifying the response. The presentation is limited to observable content and does not include interpretation or normative assessment.</p> <p>The dataset is structured using the Documented Evaluation Structures Model (DESM), which enables consistent description of document availability, stated grounds, operationalisation, and traceability across cases.</p> <p>The empirical material is analytically related to two publications based on the same underlying material: a Norwegian-language publication on documented criteria-lessness in public administration (Eines, 2026b), and an English-language analytical publication presenting empirically grounded observations of criteria-lessness in public administration (Eines, 2026f). The dataset may be described as providing the documented empirical basis for these analytical accounts.</p> <p><em>Version note:</em><br>Updated to include reference to a newly published English-language analytical publication based on the same material and to clarify the dataset’s role as the documented empirical basis.</p>
title Documented Evaluation Structures: An Empirical Dataset Based on Requests for Criteria and Factual Grounds
topic Criteriology; public administration; evaluation criteria; factual grounds; documentation; decision-making processes; empirical dataset
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19338514