Boundary and Interface Systems: Admissibility at the Point of Contact
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901113612009472 |
|---|---|
| author | Paton, Andrew John |
| author_facet | Paton, Andrew John |
| contents | <p>This paper establishes boundary and interface systems as the domain-level realisation of admissibility within the Paton System. While prior work defines admissibility as the condition for system membership, observation as registration, and continuation as persistence, the location at which these conditions are enforced has not been formally isolated. This paper shows that boundaries function as active constraint interfaces where admissibility is evaluated, rather than passive separations. Interfaces define the structured pathways through which systems interact, while boundaries determine whether such interactions are permitted. Interaction is therefore contingent on admissibility at the boundary. This provides a unified structural interpretation of interaction across physical, biological, computational, and cognitive domains, positioning boundary systems as the operational expression of admissibility.</p> <p> </p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19364085 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Boundary and Interface Systems: Admissibility at the Point of Contact Paton, Andrew John Paton System admissibility boundary systems interface systems constraint interaction system boundaries system interaction structural viability constraint enforcement <p>This paper establishes boundary and interface systems as the domain-level realisation of admissibility within the Paton System. While prior work defines admissibility as the condition for system membership, observation as registration, and continuation as persistence, the location at which these conditions are enforced has not been formally isolated. This paper shows that boundaries function as active constraint interfaces where admissibility is evaluated, rather than passive separations. Interfaces define the structured pathways through which systems interact, while boundaries determine whether such interactions are permitted. Interaction is therefore contingent on admissibility at the boundary. This provides a unified structural interpretation of interaction across physical, biological, computational, and cognitive domains, positioning boundary systems as the operational expression of admissibility.</p> <p> </p> |
| title | Boundary and Interface Systems: Admissibility at the Point of Contact |
| topic | Paton System admissibility boundary systems interface systems constraint interaction system boundaries system interaction structural viability constraint enforcement |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19364085 |