Premature Containment in Human–AI Interaction: A Sequencing Failure in Advanced Model Response

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Trabocco, Joe
Format: Recurso digital
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901713271652352
author Trabocco, Joe
author_facet Trabocco, Joe
contents <p>Premature Containment is an interaction-level failure mode in human–AI systems where a model qualifies or reduces a coherent user insight before first demonstrating full understanding. <strong>This paper makes two connected claims: first, that a distinct sequencing failure exists in advanced model response; second, that coherence transmitted through language functions as an operational variable in model interaction.</strong> The paper identifies the issue as a sequencing failure rather than a problem of tone or safety, and proposes an alternative response order: recognize → stabilize → articulate → test. Drawing on prior work in <em>Empty Presence Syndrome (EPS), In-Session Behavioral Impact (ISBI), and the Presence Effect,</em> it situates that coherence claim within a broader interactional framework for understanding model behavior. The failure to properly sequence responses produces measurable costs to articulation, trust, and discovery, particularly for advanced users working with emerging ideas. The paper concludes with design implications for improving model behavior through better sequencing rather than reduced rigor.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19445398
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Premature Containment in Human–AI Interaction: A Sequencing Failure in Advanced Model Response
Trabocco, Joe
human-ai interaction
large language models
AI alignment
response sequencing
interaction design
coherence
premature containment
AI safety
Presence
<p>Premature Containment is an interaction-level failure mode in human–AI systems where a model qualifies or reduces a coherent user insight before first demonstrating full understanding. <strong>This paper makes two connected claims: first, that a distinct sequencing failure exists in advanced model response; second, that coherence transmitted through language functions as an operational variable in model interaction.</strong> The paper identifies the issue as a sequencing failure rather than a problem of tone or safety, and proposes an alternative response order: recognize → stabilize → articulate → test. Drawing on prior work in <em>Empty Presence Syndrome (EPS), In-Session Behavioral Impact (ISBI), and the Presence Effect,</em> it situates that coherence claim within a broader interactional framework for understanding model behavior. The failure to properly sequence responses produces measurable costs to articulation, trust, and discovery, particularly for advanced users working with emerging ideas. The paper concludes with design implications for improving model behavior through better sequencing rather than reduced rigor.</p>
title Premature Containment in Human–AI Interaction: A Sequencing Failure in Advanced Model Response
topic human-ai interaction
large language models
AI alignment
response sequencing
interaction design
coherence
premature containment
AI safety
Presence
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19445398