Cover Image

[Replication package] When AI Joins the Team: Understanding Human-Agent Collaboration in Pull Requests

Fuente: Zenodo

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Author(s), Anonymous
Format:	Recurso digital
Published:	Zenodo 2026
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Does Context Size Matter? Context Structure and Integration Effort in Agent Pull Requests
by: Anonymous, Anonymous
Published: (2026)

When AI Teammates Meet Code Review: Collaboration Signals Shaping the Integration of Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Nachuma, Costain, et al.
Published: (2026)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
by: Jo, Young, et al.
Published: (2026)

Replication package for ESEM2026 review
by: Anonymous, Authors
Published: (2026)

Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
by: Milanese, Roberto, et al.
Published: (2026)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
by: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Published: (2026)

[Replication Package] EASE 2026 submission #76
by: Anonymous Author(s)
Published: (2026)

[Replication Package] ICSA 2026 submission #121
by: Anonymous Author(s)
Published: (2026)

[Replication Package] ICSA 2026 submission #121
by: Anonymous Author(s)
Published: (2026)

Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Replication package for "Leveraging Network Methods for Hub-like Microservice Detection"
by: Anonymous
Published: (2025)

How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses
by: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)

On Wasted Contributions: Understanding the Dynamics of Contributor-Abandoned Pull Requests
by: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Published: (2021)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
by: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2026)

When Machines Join the Moral Circle: The Persona Effect of Generative AI Agents in Collaborative Reasoning
by: Jin, Yueqiao, et al.
Published: (2025)

Replication Package of "Mind the SBOM Gap: Adoption and Compliance in Open Source Software"
by: Anonymous, Author
Published: (2025)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

Replication package for: Altered Histories in Version Control System Repositories: Evidence from the Trenches
by: Anonymous
Published: (2025)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Published: (2025)

Who Writes the Docs in SE 3.0? Agent vs. Human Documentation Pull Requests
by: Yamasaki, Kazuma, et al.
Published: (2026)

Who Said CVE? How Vulnerability Identifiers Are Mentioned by Humans, Bots, and Agents in Pull Requests
by: Rooijendijk, Pien, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
by: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Published: (2026)

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Duma, Kacper, et al.
Published: (2026)

Why Are AI Agent Involved Pull Requests (Fix-Related) Remain Unmerged? An Empirical Study
by: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Published: (2026)

Replication package for A Unified Cross-Language Intermediate Representation for Infrastructure-as-Code Smell Detection
by: Anonymous
Published: (2026)

Replication package for A Unified Cross-Language Intermediate Representation for Infrastructure-as-Code Smell Detection
by: Anonymous
Published: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests
by: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2026)

Early-Stage Prediction of Review Effort in AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Minh, Dao Sy Duy, et al.
Published: (2026)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
by: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Published: (2024)

Human-AI Collaboration for Estimating Scientific Replicability
by: Chakravorti, Tatiana, et al.
Published: (2026)

Replication Package for "Green AI: Cost of LLM-based Code Completion"
by: Anonymous, Anonymous
Published: (2026)

How AI Coding Agents Modify Code: A Large-Scale Study of GitHub Pull Requests
by: Ogenrwot, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2026)

Where Do AI Coding Agents Fail? An Empirical Study of Failed Agentic Pull Requests in GitHub
by: Ehsani, Ramtin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Bugdar: AI-Augmented Secure Code Review for GitHub Pull Requests
by: Naulty, John, et al.
Published: (2025)

When Faster Isn't Greener: The Hidden Costs of LLM-Based Code Optimization - Replication Package
by: Anonymous
Published: (2025)

ChatCollab: Exploring Collaboration Between Humans and AI Agents in Software Teams
by: Klieger, Benjamin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Before Humans Join the Team: Diagnosing Coordination Failures in Healthcare Robot Team Simulation
by: Bai, Yuanchen, et al.
Published: (2025)

AgenticFlict: A Large-Scale Dataset of Merge Conflicts in AI Coding Agent Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Ogenrwot, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2026)