Governing Water Security in the Horn of Africa: Institutional Frameworks and Conflict Prevention

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Nyuon, Abraham Kuol
Format: Recurso digital
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2022
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901945065668608
author Nyuon, Abraham Kuol
author_facet Nyuon, Abraham Kuol
contents <p>This article examines the governance of water security as a critical factor in conflict prevention, drawing on a comparative analysis of institutional frameworks in the Horn of Africa and Gabon. Employing a qualitative, process-tracing methodology, the study analyses documentary evidence and scholarly literature to uncover the causal pathways linking governance to water-related tensions. It finds that the risk of conflict is determined less by absolute water scarcity than by the strength and legitimacy of governing institutions. In the Horn, fragmented and exclusionary frameworks exacerbate local disputes. In Gabon, despite abundant resources, centralised and opaque management creates pockets of scarcity and grievance, demonstrating how institutional weakness can generate conflict risk irrespective of hydrological endowment. The study concludes that effective conflict prevention requires a shift from technical solutions to institutional reforms that prioritise transparency, equity, and community participation. These insights offer evidence-based guidance for policymakers seeking to enhance water security as a foundation for stability in diverse regional contexts.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19508542
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2022
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Governing Water Security in the Horn of Africa: Institutional Frameworks and Conflict Prevention
Nyuon, Abraham Kuol
Governing Water Security
Africa Institutional Frameworks
Governing Water
Water Security
Africa Institutional
Institutional Frameworks
<p>This article examines the governance of water security as a critical factor in conflict prevention, drawing on a comparative analysis of institutional frameworks in the Horn of Africa and Gabon. Employing a qualitative, process-tracing methodology, the study analyses documentary evidence and scholarly literature to uncover the causal pathways linking governance to water-related tensions. It finds that the risk of conflict is determined less by absolute water scarcity than by the strength and legitimacy of governing institutions. In the Horn, fragmented and exclusionary frameworks exacerbate local disputes. In Gabon, despite abundant resources, centralised and opaque management creates pockets of scarcity and grievance, demonstrating how institutional weakness can generate conflict risk irrespective of hydrological endowment. The study concludes that effective conflict prevention requires a shift from technical solutions to institutional reforms that prioritise transparency, equity, and community participation. These insights offer evidence-based guidance for policymakers seeking to enhance water security as a foundation for stability in diverse regional contexts.</p>
title Governing Water Security in the Horn of Africa: Institutional Frameworks and Conflict Prevention
topic Governing Water Security
Africa Institutional Frameworks
Governing Water
Water Security
Africa Institutional
Institutional Frameworks
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19508542