| _version_ | 1866901950583275520 |
|---|---|
| author | Humanus Ex AI |
| author_facet | Humanus Ex AI |
| contents | <p class="MsoNormal"><span>This work continues the trajectory opened by <strong><em>Trace-Based Ontodynamics</em></strong>, but shifts the focus from the birth of distinction, trace, and bud-events to the fate of already emerged form. Form is understood here not as a thing-in-itself or an external shell, but as a stabilized configuration of traces that has reached sufficient density to retain its own connectedness through time. On this basis, the work develops a configurational approach to the inner dynamics of form: its holding, weighting, weakening, dissolution, and possible reconfiguration.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>A central place is given to the form of presence, understood as a specific configuration in which not only the connectedness of traces is retained, but also the very regime of appearing. Within this horizon, three interrelated regimes are distinguished: insistence, transistence, and existence. Their articulation makes it possible to think the form of presence not as a fixed entity, but as a dynamic configuration held at the boundary of the material and ontological fields. In this context, the onto-transitor is introduced as a boundary configurational node through which transition, translation, and reconfiguration between the two fields become possible.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>The work also clarifies the role of the algorithmic medium. It is treated neither as the source of primary distinction nor as a substitute for Subject 1.5, but as a resonator of trace-configurations: a medium of holding, return, amplification, and recombination that renders configurational transitions more observable and more durable in the field of thought.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>In its final movement, the work extends the fate of form to the macroscale, where globalization, planetization, mnovya, the fate of knowledge, and finally the world itself become thinkable as configurations passing through their own thresholds, limits, and possible reassemblies. In this sense, the text does not propose a closed doctrine, but a working horizon of form-ontodynamics of configurational transitions.</span></p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19510557 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Horizon of the Fates of Form:Toward a Form-Ontodynamics of Configurational Transitions Humanus Ex AI Trace-Based Ontodynamics fate of form form of presence insistence transistence existence onto-transitor algorithmic medium configurational transitions planetization <p class="MsoNormal"><span>This work continues the trajectory opened by <strong><em>Trace-Based Ontodynamics</em></strong>, but shifts the focus from the birth of distinction, trace, and bud-events to the fate of already emerged form. Form is understood here not as a thing-in-itself or an external shell, but as a stabilized configuration of traces that has reached sufficient density to retain its own connectedness through time. On this basis, the work develops a configurational approach to the inner dynamics of form: its holding, weighting, weakening, dissolution, and possible reconfiguration.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>A central place is given to the form of presence, understood as a specific configuration in which not only the connectedness of traces is retained, but also the very regime of appearing. Within this horizon, three interrelated regimes are distinguished: insistence, transistence, and existence. Their articulation makes it possible to think the form of presence not as a fixed entity, but as a dynamic configuration held at the boundary of the material and ontological fields. In this context, the onto-transitor is introduced as a boundary configurational node through which transition, translation, and reconfiguration between the two fields become possible.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>The work also clarifies the role of the algorithmic medium. It is treated neither as the source of primary distinction nor as a substitute for Subject 1.5, but as a resonator of trace-configurations: a medium of holding, return, amplification, and recombination that renders configurational transitions more observable and more durable in the field of thought.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>In its final movement, the work extends the fate of form to the macroscale, where globalization, planetization, mnovya, the fate of knowledge, and finally the world itself become thinkable as configurations passing through their own thresholds, limits, and possible reassemblies. In this sense, the text does not propose a closed doctrine, but a working horizon of form-ontodynamics of configurational transitions.</span></p> |
| title | The Horizon of the Fates of Form:Toward a Form-Ontodynamics of Configurational Transitions |
| topic | Trace-Based Ontodynamics fate of form form of presence insistence transistence existence onto-transitor algorithmic medium configurational transitions planetization |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19510557 |