Algorithmic Governance and CEO Obsolescence and Liability

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stern, Annabelle J.
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901985217740800
author Stern, Annabelle J.
author_facet Stern, Annabelle J.
contents <p>This paper advances a central proposition: the biological Chief Executive Officer (CEO), as currently<br>constituted within corporate governance structures, represents a high-latency, cognitively bounded,<br>and behaviorally inconsistent decision node — a legacy artifact of pre-algorithmic management theory.<br>As Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems approach what this paper terms 'Systemic Governance<br>Capability' (SGC), the velocity differential between human executive cognition (measured in hundreds<br>of milliseconds) and algorithmic market-response infrastructure (operating at sub-microsecond latency)<br>renders biological leadership not merely sub-optimal, but functionally incompatible with fiduciary<br>obligation. Drawing on empirical latency benchmarks, behavioral economics literature, neurocognitive<br>performance data, and corporate governance theory, this analysis argues that boards of directors will<br>face mounting legal and ethical pressure to transition C-suite functions toward optimized algorithmic<br>governance models. The CEO is not framed here as a visionary — but as a biological friction point<br>whose continued tenure carries quantifiable liability risk.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19520679
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Algorithmic Governance and CEO Obsolescence and Liability
Stern, Annabelle J.
algorithmic architecture
structural obsolescence
enviromental psychopathology
spatial determinism
technocratic design
automated aesthetic
human-centric displacement
forensic urbanism
elon musk
mark zuckerburg
alexandr wang
bezos
<p>This paper advances a central proposition: the biological Chief Executive Officer (CEO), as currently<br>constituted within corporate governance structures, represents a high-latency, cognitively bounded,<br>and behaviorally inconsistent decision node — a legacy artifact of pre-algorithmic management theory.<br>As Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems approach what this paper terms 'Systemic Governance<br>Capability' (SGC), the velocity differential between human executive cognition (measured in hundreds<br>of milliseconds) and algorithmic market-response infrastructure (operating at sub-microsecond latency)<br>renders biological leadership not merely sub-optimal, but functionally incompatible with fiduciary<br>obligation. Drawing on empirical latency benchmarks, behavioral economics literature, neurocognitive<br>performance data, and corporate governance theory, this analysis argues that boards of directors will<br>face mounting legal and ethical pressure to transition C-suite functions toward optimized algorithmic<br>governance models. The CEO is not framed here as a visionary — but as a biological friction point<br>whose continued tenure carries quantifiable liability risk.</p>
title Algorithmic Governance and CEO Obsolescence and Liability
topic algorithmic architecture
structural obsolescence
enviromental psychopathology
spatial determinism
technocratic design
automated aesthetic
human-centric displacement
forensic urbanism
elon musk
mark zuckerburg
alexandr wang
bezos
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19520679