The Ontology of Field: Continuous Free-State Energy, Constraint Network Topology and the Emergence of Interaction

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yang, Hongpu
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901261660454912
author Yang, Hongpu
author_facet Yang, Hongpu
contents <p>What is a field? Is it an independent entity, a property of matter, a mathematical convenience, or something more fundamental? From Faraday’s lines of force to Maxwell’s electromagnetic equations, from Einstein’s gravitational field to the quantum fields of the Standard Model, the field concept has become the central language of fundamental physics. Yet its ontological status remains contested. Energy-Efficiency Theory (EET) provides a first-principles answer grounded in the axiom that energy is the sole ontology. A field is not an independent substance but a specific mode of energy existence: the continuous, spatially extended distribution of free-state energy across the free-state channels (Type II edges) of a constraint network. This paper develops the complete ontology of field from the generative foundations of EET Core Rules v5.2.<br>At L1, field is defined by three essential features: continuity, propagation, and superposition. Field and particle are not two separate kinds of entity but two complementary modes of the same energy ontology. A particle is a localized constrainedstate excitation; a field is the continuous free-state background from which particles emerge and into which they dissolve. Wave-particle duality is the macroscopic signature of the energy ratio η fluctuating near unity—a dynamic equilibrium between free and constrained states. We establish a five-dimensional classification of fields grounded in EET core concepts: free-state weight, role in the Energy-Efficiency Cycle, informational texture level, propagation speed, and coupling mode. This classification reveals the unified essence of all physical fields. We establish complete interfaces to all companion ontologies and provide cross-scale instantiations from quantum fields to neural fields. This adds the universal critical point (η ≈ 1) as the optimal regime across all scales, external validation from emergent gauge fields in spin liquids, and expanded biological (morphogenetic) and cognitive (neural) field instantiations. Falsifiable predictions anchor the framework in empirical testability. Field is the breath of energy when unconstrained—the continuous unfolding of free-state energy in the<br>topology of constraint. </p> <p>Keywords: Field; free-state energy; constraint network; Type II edge; wave-particle duality; Energy-Efficiency Theory; field classification; neural field; morphogenetic field</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19634498
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle The Ontology of Field: Continuous Free-State Energy, Constraint Network Topology and the Emergence of Interaction
Yang, Hongpu
fields
free-state energy
Energy-Efficiency Theory
EET
electromagnetic field
gravitational field
quantum field
constraint network
Type II edge
wave-particle duality
field classification
neural field
field classification
<p>What is a field? Is it an independent entity, a property of matter, a mathematical convenience, or something more fundamental? From Faraday’s lines of force to Maxwell’s electromagnetic equations, from Einstein’s gravitational field to the quantum fields of the Standard Model, the field concept has become the central language of fundamental physics. Yet its ontological status remains contested. Energy-Efficiency Theory (EET) provides a first-principles answer grounded in the axiom that energy is the sole ontology. A field is not an independent substance but a specific mode of energy existence: the continuous, spatially extended distribution of free-state energy across the free-state channels (Type II edges) of a constraint network. This paper develops the complete ontology of field from the generative foundations of EET Core Rules v5.2.<br>At L1, field is defined by three essential features: continuity, propagation, and superposition. Field and particle are not two separate kinds of entity but two complementary modes of the same energy ontology. A particle is a localized constrainedstate excitation; a field is the continuous free-state background from which particles emerge and into which they dissolve. Wave-particle duality is the macroscopic signature of the energy ratio η fluctuating near unity—a dynamic equilibrium between free and constrained states. We establish a five-dimensional classification of fields grounded in EET core concepts: free-state weight, role in the Energy-Efficiency Cycle, informational texture level, propagation speed, and coupling mode. This classification reveals the unified essence of all physical fields. We establish complete interfaces to all companion ontologies and provide cross-scale instantiations from quantum fields to neural fields. This adds the universal critical point (η ≈ 1) as the optimal regime across all scales, external validation from emergent gauge fields in spin liquids, and expanded biological (morphogenetic) and cognitive (neural) field instantiations. Falsifiable predictions anchor the framework in empirical testability. Field is the breath of energy when unconstrained—the continuous unfolding of free-state energy in the<br>topology of constraint. </p> <p>Keywords: Field; free-state energy; constraint network; Type II edge; wave-particle duality; Energy-Efficiency Theory; field classification; neural field; morphogenetic field</p>
title The Ontology of Field: Continuous Free-State Energy, Constraint Network Topology and the Emergence of Interaction
topic fields
free-state energy
Energy-Efficiency Theory
EET
electromagnetic field
gravitational field
quantum field
constraint network
Type II edge
wave-particle duality
field classification
neural field
field classification
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19634498