Mass Ratio Correction and Quantum Oscillation in the Fine Structure Constant: The Role of m_e/m_p and e (Paper III of III)

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Yan, Zheng
Natura: Recurso digital
Lingua:inglese
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866901368290148352
author Yan, Zheng
author_facet Yan, Zheng
contents <p>Building on Paper II (1/α_ideal = 24π²/√3 = 136.757), we derive two physical corrections that bring the prediction to 14.9 ppb precision.</p> <p>  1/α = 24π²/√3 + √3/6·(1 − mₑ/mₚ − 1/(4e²)) = 137.035 999 121</p> <p>CODATA 2018: 137.035 999 084. Discrepancy: +2.0×10⁻⁷ (14.9 ppb).</p> <p>─── First correction: CODATA precision mass measurements ──</p> <p>The electron and proton are the two long-lived stable charged particles in nature. Both carry identical electromagnetic charge; both satisfy the TGA stability condition. Since they share the same outer electromagnetic coupling frequency, their difference is entirely in the inner fermionic energy — encoded in the mass ratio mₑ/mₚ.</p> <p>Using CODATA 2018:<br>  mₑ = 0.510 998 950 00 MeV  (±1.5×10⁻¹⁰)<br>  mₚ = 938.272 088 16 MeV    (±3.1×10⁻¹⁰)</p> <p>  δ₁ = √3/6·(1 − mₑ/mₚ) = +0.288 518<br>  → 1/α⁽¹⁾ = 137.046  (71 ppm)</p> <p>─── Second correction: quantum oscillation and Euler's number e ──</p> <p>The TGA projection is a continuous existence payment process: the fermion pays its existence cost at every moment, like continuous compounding. The natural base of this process is Euler's number e:</p> <p>  lim(n→∞) (1 − 1/n)ⁿ = 1/e = 0.367879...</p> <p>The zero-point oscillation amplitude is identified numerically as Aω ≈ 1/e:</p> <p>  δ₂ = −√3/6·1/(4e²) = −0.009 767</p> <p>Verification: |δ₂|/τ_G(e) = 0.033841 vs 1/(4e²) = 0.033834 (agreement 0.021%)</p> <p>─── Precision progression ───────────────────────────────</p> <p>  Topology only (Paper II):    136.757      2034 ppm<br>  + CODATA masses:             137.046        71 ppm<br>  + quantum correction e:      137.035 999 121   14.9 ppb  (4800× improvement)</p> <p>─── Physical implications ───────────────────────────────</p> <p>(1) Gravity is not a force — both the electron and proton are equally stable despite a factor of 1836 difference in TGA projection magnitude. Stability depends on existence of the patch, not its size.<br>(2) The strong force requires no independent mediators — both particles share the identical stability mechanism.</p> <p>─── Series information ──────────────────────────────────</p> <p>Paper III of III. Published simultaneously with:<br>- Paper I: Overview and main result (1/α = 137.035 999 121, 14.9 ppb)<br>- Paper II: Geometric derivation of 24π²/√3 (no mass input)</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19654453
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Mass Ratio Correction and Quantum Oscillation in the Fine Structure Constant: The Role of m_e/m_p and e (Paper III of III)
Yan, Zheng
fine structure constant
electron-proton mass ratio
CODATA precision measurement
Euler's number
quantum zero-point correction
Möbius standing wave
ppb precision
fundamental constants
quantum correction
standing wave fermion
Continuous Existence Payment
Möbius Standing Wave
Mass Ratio Correction
First Principles Derivation
CODATA 2018
<p>Building on Paper II (1/α_ideal = 24π²/√3 = 136.757), we derive two physical corrections that bring the prediction to 14.9 ppb precision.</p> <p>  1/α = 24π²/√3 + √3/6·(1 − mₑ/mₚ − 1/(4e²)) = 137.035 999 121</p> <p>CODATA 2018: 137.035 999 084. Discrepancy: +2.0×10⁻⁷ (14.9 ppb).</p> <p>─── First correction: CODATA precision mass measurements ──</p> <p>The electron and proton are the two long-lived stable charged particles in nature. Both carry identical electromagnetic charge; both satisfy the TGA stability condition. Since they share the same outer electromagnetic coupling frequency, their difference is entirely in the inner fermionic energy — encoded in the mass ratio mₑ/mₚ.</p> <p>Using CODATA 2018:<br>  mₑ = 0.510 998 950 00 MeV  (±1.5×10⁻¹⁰)<br>  mₚ = 938.272 088 16 MeV    (±3.1×10⁻¹⁰)</p> <p>  δ₁ = √3/6·(1 − mₑ/mₚ) = +0.288 518<br>  → 1/α⁽¹⁾ = 137.046  (71 ppm)</p> <p>─── Second correction: quantum oscillation and Euler's number e ──</p> <p>The TGA projection is a continuous existence payment process: the fermion pays its existence cost at every moment, like continuous compounding. The natural base of this process is Euler's number e:</p> <p>  lim(n→∞) (1 − 1/n)ⁿ = 1/e = 0.367879...</p> <p>The zero-point oscillation amplitude is identified numerically as Aω ≈ 1/e:</p> <p>  δ₂ = −√3/6·1/(4e²) = −0.009 767</p> <p>Verification: |δ₂|/τ_G(e) = 0.033841 vs 1/(4e²) = 0.033834 (agreement 0.021%)</p> <p>─── Precision progression ───────────────────────────────</p> <p>  Topology only (Paper II):    136.757      2034 ppm<br>  + CODATA masses:             137.046        71 ppm<br>  + quantum correction e:      137.035 999 121   14.9 ppb  (4800× improvement)</p> <p>─── Physical implications ───────────────────────────────</p> <p>(1) Gravity is not a force — both the electron and proton are equally stable despite a factor of 1836 difference in TGA projection magnitude. Stability depends on existence of the patch, not its size.<br>(2) The strong force requires no independent mediators — both particles share the identical stability mechanism.</p> <p>─── Series information ──────────────────────────────────</p> <p>Paper III of III. Published simultaneously with:<br>- Paper I: Overview and main result (1/α = 137.035 999 121, 14.9 ppb)<br>- Paper II: Geometric derivation of 24π²/√3 (no mass input)</p>
title Mass Ratio Correction and Quantum Oscillation in the Fine Structure Constant: The Role of m_e/m_p and e (Paper III of III)
topic fine structure constant
electron-proton mass ratio
CODATA precision measurement
Euler's number
quantum zero-point correction
Möbius standing wave
ppb precision
fundamental constants
quantum correction
standing wave fermion
Continuous Existence Payment
Möbius Standing Wave
Mass Ratio Correction
First Principles Derivation
CODATA 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19654453