Extended Reality Resources for Teaching Physics. Book of Annexes
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901922033696768 |
|---|---|
| author | Lucía Amorós-Poveda Julio Cabero-Almenara Jeannet Chaljub-Hasbún |
| author_facet | Lucía Amorós-Poveda Julio Cabero-Almenara Jeannet Chaljub-Hasbún |
| contents | <p>This work examines the pedagogical integration and evaluation of extended reality (XR) resources to teaching Physics, including augmented, virtual, and mixed reality, within higher education through the MEREVIA and REFODIGE projects. It argues that XR assessment must be embedded in complex curricular contexts, considering learning outcomes, motivation, satisfaction, and cognitive load. A multidimensional evaluation framework is proposed, combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Empirical procedures involve resource description and expert evaluation. Findings highlight both the potential and limitations of XR, emphasising teacher training, methodological rigour, and contextualised implementation to achieve meaningful educational impact.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19662676 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Extended Reality Resources for Teaching Physics. Book of Annexes Lucía Amorós-Poveda Julio Cabero-Almenara Jeannet Chaljub-Hasbún Educational Technology Teaching Physics <p>This work examines the pedagogical integration and evaluation of extended reality (XR) resources to teaching Physics, including augmented, virtual, and mixed reality, within higher education through the MEREVIA and REFODIGE projects. It argues that XR assessment must be embedded in complex curricular contexts, considering learning outcomes, motivation, satisfaction, and cognitive load. A multidimensional evaluation framework is proposed, combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Empirical procedures involve resource description and expert evaluation. Findings highlight both the potential and limitations of XR, emphasising teacher training, methodological rigour, and contextualised implementation to achieve meaningful educational impact.</p> |
| title | Extended Reality Resources for Teaching Physics. Book of Annexes |
| topic | Educational Technology Teaching Physics |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19662676 |