PREA: Establishing Reality as a System Variable - The First Complete Theory–Practice–AI Architecture
Fuente:
Zenodo
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901885448880128 |
|---|---|
| author | Lehmann, Katja |
| author_facet | Lehmann, Katja |
| contents | <p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Modern systems do not operate on reality but on interpretation.</span></strong><span> <strong>Because reality is not a defined, validated, or operationalized variable, instability emerges across all domains.</strong> This absence of a <strong>reality‑validation function</strong> produces a four‑fold blind gap: (1) <strong>Theory does not know the gap</strong> because it presupposes reality without defining it; (2) <strong>Practice cannot name the gap</strong> because it experiences symptoms without access to the underlying cause; (3) <strong>AI research does not see the gap</strong> because models process patterns, not reality; (4) <strong>Systems cannot measure the gap</strong> because reality is not a system variable.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>As a result, decisions become unstable, communication breaks, organizations lose orientation, processes drift, and AI systems hallucinate. All these phenomena share a single structural cause: <strong>the absence of a reality‑validation architecture</strong>.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>PREA introduces the first complete Theory–Practice–AI architecture by establishing reality as a <strong>system variable</strong>.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>It does so by <strong>defining reality</strong>, <strong>validating premises</strong>, and <strong>operationalizing reality</strong>, thereby stabilizing systems across domains.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>This paper closes the circle initiated with the identification of the structural argumentation gap in Lehmann (2026). With the completion of the PREA architecture, the discipline is concluded.</span></p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19698529 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | PREA: Establishing Reality as a System Variable - The First Complete Theory–Practice–AI Architecture Lehmann, Katja Reality‑Validation Architecture PREA System Variable Theory–Practice–AI Integration Structural Gap Premise Validation Operational Reality Dynamic Stability Architectural Determinism Interpretation vs. Reality Blind Spot <p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Modern systems do not operate on reality but on interpretation.</span></strong><span> <strong>Because reality is not a defined, validated, or operationalized variable, instability emerges across all domains.</strong> This absence of a <strong>reality‑validation function</strong> produces a four‑fold blind gap: (1) <strong>Theory does not know the gap</strong> because it presupposes reality without defining it; (2) <strong>Practice cannot name the gap</strong> because it experiences symptoms without access to the underlying cause; (3) <strong>AI research does not see the gap</strong> because models process patterns, not reality; (4) <strong>Systems cannot measure the gap</strong> because reality is not a system variable.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>As a result, decisions become unstable, communication breaks, organizations lose orientation, processes drift, and AI systems hallucinate. All these phenomena share a single structural cause: <strong>the absence of a reality‑validation architecture</strong>.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>PREA introduces the first complete Theory–Practice–AI architecture by establishing reality as a <strong>system variable</strong>.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>It does so by <strong>defining reality</strong>, <strong>validating premises</strong>, and <strong>operationalizing reality</strong>, thereby stabilizing systems across domains.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>This paper closes the circle initiated with the identification of the structural argumentation gap in Lehmann (2026). With the completion of the PREA architecture, the discipline is concluded.</span></p> |
| title | PREA: Establishing Reality as a System Variable - The First Complete Theory–Practice–AI Architecture |
| topic | Reality‑Validation Architecture PREA System Variable Theory–Practice–AI Integration Structural Gap Premise Validation Operational Reality Dynamic Stability Architectural Determinism Interpretation vs. Reality Blind Spot |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19698529 |