Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19766670 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901143722917888 |
|---|---|
| author | Iliagtem, Artmen |
| author_facet | Iliagtem, Artmen |
| contents | <p>Scientiam is the beef that the only real knowledge comes from scence" But that very statement is not acertific you cannot prove in a labor with an equation</p> <p> </p> <p>It is pure philosophy Scientiam defeats itself & claims only scence gives knowledge, yet the claim itaaff is not scientific Logical sackte Science eglans "HOW the universe works (mechanisms) Scientiam legally jumps to WHY questions Why is there something neither than nothing? Why are the laws of physics exactly these and nof others? Why does mathematics perfectly descitte reality? Why does consciousness sxist? Why is thers objective morality?These we metaphysical questions, outside the domain of science by definition. Even top scientista admit Stephen Hawking "Even if there is only ane possibile unified theory it is just a set of rules and equations. What is that breathes fre into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? Eugene Wigner (Nobel natum is mathematical is a mystery "Solentiam confuses two completely different levels Physics "How the apple flaw of gravity Metaphysics. "Why apples, laws, and space exist at af The First is science. The second is beyond its reach. Why science cannot cover or disprove Gat licence can only study engs make the universe matter, energy space, time God by definition, is the uncreated Creator of matter, energy, space, and time themselves. You cannot put the Author of the book inside a test lube that He Himself wrote Tryeng to use science to disprove God is like using a character in a video game to prove the programiner does not exist. The todis of the game cannot reach outside the game. Why God sexiste even if science never detects" Hin The fine-tuning of the universe (1in10bbity) screams intelligent design. The existence of objective more law requires a moral Lawgiver. The resurrection of Jesus is the best-attested event in ancient history (500+ eyewitnesses, transformed lives, empty tomth) Balions of people throughout history have had personal encounters with the living God that is evidence too, just</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19766670 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Scientism as a categorical fallacy!!! Iliagtem, Artmen Scientism <p>Scientiam is the beef that the only real knowledge comes from scence" But that very statement is not acertific you cannot prove in a labor with an equation</p> <p> </p> <p>It is pure philosophy Scientiam defeats itself & claims only scence gives knowledge, yet the claim itaaff is not scientific Logical sackte Science eglans "HOW the universe works (mechanisms) Scientiam legally jumps to WHY questions Why is there something neither than nothing? Why are the laws of physics exactly these and nof others? Why does mathematics perfectly descitte reality? Why does consciousness sxist? Why is thers objective morality?These we metaphysical questions, outside the domain of science by definition. Even top scientista admit Stephen Hawking "Even if there is only ane possibile unified theory it is just a set of rules and equations. What is that breathes fre into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? Eugene Wigner (Nobel natum is mathematical is a mystery "Solentiam confuses two completely different levels Physics "How the apple flaw of gravity Metaphysics. "Why apples, laws, and space exist at af The First is science. The second is beyond its reach. Why science cannot cover or disprove Gat licence can only study engs make the universe matter, energy space, time God by definition, is the uncreated Creator of matter, energy, space, and time themselves. You cannot put the Author of the book inside a test lube that He Himself wrote Tryeng to use science to disprove God is like using a character in a video game to prove the programiner does not exist. The todis of the game cannot reach outside the game. Why God sexiste even if science never detects" Hin The fine-tuning of the universe (1in10bbity) screams intelligent design. The existence of objective more law requires a moral Lawgiver. The resurrection of Jesus is the best-attested event in ancient history (500+ eyewitnesses, transformed lives, empty tomth) Balions of people throughout history have had personal encounters with the living God that is evidence too, just</p> |
| title | Scientism as a categorical fallacy!!! |
| topic | Scientism |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19766670 |