The Convergence Index: The Mixing Zone of Human Mechanization and AI Humanization

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yamada, Kenji
Format: Recurso digital
Published: Zenodo 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901760123076608
author Yamada, Kenji
author_facet Yamada, Kenji
contents <p>Two vast scholarly traditions have developed largely in isolation. Bioethics has<br>spent decades debating human enhancement—prosthetics, brain-computer interfaces,<br>cognitive offloading—charting the progressive mechanization of the<br>human body and mind. AI ethics, meanwhile, has examined the humanization<br>of artificial agents—robotic embodiment, emotional simulation, proposals for<br>legal personhood. This paper argues that these two trajectories are not parallel<br>but convergent—moving toward each other along a single axis, and proposes<br>the Convergence Index (CI) as a conceptual framework for measuring<br>their mutual approach. CI is defined as CI = 1 − |FRR − AIHR|, where Functional<br>Residual Ratio (FRR) captures the degree to which a human remains<br>non-mechanized, and AI Humanization Rate (AIHR) captures the degree to<br>which an AI system approximates human capacities. Four measurement dimensions<br>are identified for each variable: body, brain/processing, cognition,<br>and mind/affect. A critical finding is that on the body axis, FRR and AIHR share<br>identical engineering metrics—the gait naturalness of a bionic leg and the gait<br>naturalness of a humanoid robot are evaluated by the same biomechanical<br>standards. As CI approaches a Convergence Threshold (CT), the ontological<br>1<br>distinction between human and AI becomes empirically unverifiable—a condition<br>formalized by the Human-Yūrei Conjecture theorem. Because CT is in<br>principle indeterminate, binary regulatory frameworks (human/non-human)<br>are structurally inadequate; gradation-based institutional design becomes unavoidable.<br>The paper specifies the dimensions of measurement; quantitative<br>operationalization is deferred to subsequent research.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19781684
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle The Convergence Index: The Mixing Zone of Human Mechanization and AI Humanization
Yamada, Kenji
convergence index
human enhancement
AI humanization
posthumanism
gradation
bioethics
<p>Two vast scholarly traditions have developed largely in isolation. Bioethics has<br>spent decades debating human enhancement—prosthetics, brain-computer interfaces,<br>cognitive offloading—charting the progressive mechanization of the<br>human body and mind. AI ethics, meanwhile, has examined the humanization<br>of artificial agents—robotic embodiment, emotional simulation, proposals for<br>legal personhood. This paper argues that these two trajectories are not parallel<br>but convergent—moving toward each other along a single axis, and proposes<br>the Convergence Index (CI) as a conceptual framework for measuring<br>their mutual approach. CI is defined as CI = 1 − |FRR − AIHR|, where Functional<br>Residual Ratio (FRR) captures the degree to which a human remains<br>non-mechanized, and AI Humanization Rate (AIHR) captures the degree to<br>which an AI system approximates human capacities. Four measurement dimensions<br>are identified for each variable: body, brain/processing, cognition,<br>and mind/affect. A critical finding is that on the body axis, FRR and AIHR share<br>identical engineering metrics—the gait naturalness of a bionic leg and the gait<br>naturalness of a humanoid robot are evaluated by the same biomechanical<br>standards. As CI approaches a Convergence Threshold (CT), the ontological<br>1<br>distinction between human and AI becomes empirically unverifiable—a condition<br>formalized by the Human-Yūrei Conjecture theorem. Because CT is in<br>principle indeterminate, binary regulatory frameworks (human/non-human)<br>are structurally inadequate; gradation-based institutional design becomes unavoidable.<br>The paper specifies the dimensions of measurement; quantitative<br>operationalization is deferred to subsequent research.</p>
title The Convergence Index: The Mixing Zone of Human Mechanization and AI Humanization
topic convergence index
human enhancement
AI humanization
posthumanism
gradation
bioethics
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19781684