Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19855440 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866902131924008960 |
|---|---|
| author | Dogukan Ali Gundogan |
| author_facet | Dogukan Ali Gundogan |
| contents | Current RAG evaluation conflates citation correctness (does the cited doc support the claim?) with citation faithfulness (did the model actually rely on the doc, or post-rationalize from parametric memory?). A feasible prototype would use causal interventions like context ablation and attention attribution on existing RAG benchmarks to score faithfulness, since standard metrics like RAGAS miss this distinction. |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19855440 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Measuring citation faithfulness in RAG outputs Dogukan Ali Gundogan Current RAG evaluation conflates citation correctness (does the cited doc support the claim?) with citation faithfulness (did the model actually rely on the doc, or post-rationalize from parametric memory?). A feasible prototype would use causal interventions like context ablation and attention attribution on existing RAG benchmarks to score faithfulness, since standard metrics like RAGAS miss this distinction. |
| title | Measuring citation faithfulness in RAG outputs |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19855440 |