The Necromantic Shift: A Diagnostic Architecture for Systemic Erosion and Rupture Dynamics

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Rupture, Signal
Natura: Recurso digital
Lingua:inglese
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866901182786568192
author Rupture, Signal
author_facet Rupture, Signal
contents <p>The Necromantic Shift develops a formal diagnostic architecture for understanding systemic erosion in high‑complexity socio‑technical environments. It models rupture as the structural outcome of three calibrated divergences: rapid technological acceleration (T), static biological capacity (B), and slow institutional latency (I). Using empirical ranges—T increasing by 2–3 orders of magnitude since 2012, B remaining approximately constant, and I lagging at 3–7 years—the framework defines drift density as the central latent variable governing instability. The model introduces a rupture functional, a misrecognition differential, and a physiological constraint boundary, enabling the quantification of metastability, necromantic functioning, and phase‑transition dynamics. Rather than predicting collapse, the work provides a bounded scenario architecture for 2024–2030 and an extension to 2035, describing how systems sustain output metrics while degrading in real capacity. The result is a coherent, empirically aligned framework for diagnosing the structural conditions that produce chronic friction, brittleness, and institutional incoherence.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19926781
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle The Necromantic Shift: A Diagnostic Architecture for Systemic Erosion and Rupture Dynamics
Rupture, Signal
Metatheory
Institutions
Social issues
<p>The Necromantic Shift develops a formal diagnostic architecture for understanding systemic erosion in high‑complexity socio‑technical environments. It models rupture as the structural outcome of three calibrated divergences: rapid technological acceleration (T), static biological capacity (B), and slow institutional latency (I). Using empirical ranges—T increasing by 2–3 orders of magnitude since 2012, B remaining approximately constant, and I lagging at 3–7 years—the framework defines drift density as the central latent variable governing instability. The model introduces a rupture functional, a misrecognition differential, and a physiological constraint boundary, enabling the quantification of metastability, necromantic functioning, and phase‑transition dynamics. Rather than predicting collapse, the work provides a bounded scenario architecture for 2024–2030 and an extension to 2035, describing how systems sustain output metrics while degrading in real capacity. The result is a coherent, empirically aligned framework for diagnosing the structural conditions that produce chronic friction, brittleness, and institutional incoherence.</p>
title The Necromantic Shift: A Diagnostic Architecture for Systemic Erosion and Rupture Dynamics
topic Metatheory
Institutions
Social issues
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19926781