Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19929769 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866902224127393792 |
|---|---|
| author | QianJun Yu |
| author_facet | QianJun Yu |
| contents | <div> <p class="MsoNormal">This paper presents a retrospective single-subject case study of a self-constructed internal cognitive agent formed under prolonged social isolation and elevated cognitive stress. The Opposition–Load–Coupling (OLC) model proposes a multi-stage mechanism: environmental preconditioning, construction via self-talk, opposition induction, load amplification, subconscious coupling, and emergent phenomenological autonomy. A Shared Value Anchor (SVA) is proposed as the central stabilization mechanism, functioning as a protected invariant that bounds opposition intensity and prevents full system fragmentation. The SVA is the model’s primary theoretical contribution: it specifies a condition under which internal opposition is proposed to remain productive rather than destabilizing, and generates a testable structural hypothesis—that disruption of the anchor precedes boundary collapse—which is distinguishable from a simpler load-threshold account and amenable to prospective multi-subject testing.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">Existing multi-voice frameworks—notably Dialogical Self Theory (Hermans, 2001, 2010) and Internal Family Systems (Schwartz, 1995)—describe the presence of semi-autonomous internal positions and their coordination, but do not model the load-dependent coupling mechanism through which an opposition channel acquires subconscious input streams, nor do they specify the stabilizing role of a shared value invariant under high-load conditions. The OLC model addresses these gaps. Theoretical alignment with predictive processing accounts (Friston, 2010) is proposed: load amplification is interpreted as a reduction in top-down precision weighting, allowing bottom-up associative signals to exert stronger influence on opposition-channel output (Shiffrin & Schneider, 1977).</p> <p class="MsoNormal">The construct yielded functional benefits in adversarial reasoning and internal simulation while boundary integrity held. Once boundaries degraded, the same mechanisms produced decision interference and severe functional deterioration. Dissolution required deliberate multi-step disengagement, after which cognition transitioned to externalized structured frameworks. The contribution is a structured descriptive model with defined stability conditions, operationalized boundary indicators, and positioned SVA claims. Limitations of single-subject retrospective methodology are fully acknowledged; the case is presented as a candidate mechanism structure requiring multi-subject validation.</p> </div> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19929769 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | A Minimal Structural Model of Opposition–Load–Coupling Induced Instability in Cognitive Systems QianJun Yu <div> <p class="MsoNormal">This paper presents a retrospective single-subject case study of a self-constructed internal cognitive agent formed under prolonged social isolation and elevated cognitive stress. The Opposition–Load–Coupling (OLC) model proposes a multi-stage mechanism: environmental preconditioning, construction via self-talk, opposition induction, load amplification, subconscious coupling, and emergent phenomenological autonomy. A Shared Value Anchor (SVA) is proposed as the central stabilization mechanism, functioning as a protected invariant that bounds opposition intensity and prevents full system fragmentation. The SVA is the model’s primary theoretical contribution: it specifies a condition under which internal opposition is proposed to remain productive rather than destabilizing, and generates a testable structural hypothesis—that disruption of the anchor precedes boundary collapse—which is distinguishable from a simpler load-threshold account and amenable to prospective multi-subject testing.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">Existing multi-voice frameworks—notably Dialogical Self Theory (Hermans, 2001, 2010) and Internal Family Systems (Schwartz, 1995)—describe the presence of semi-autonomous internal positions and their coordination, but do not model the load-dependent coupling mechanism through which an opposition channel acquires subconscious input streams, nor do they specify the stabilizing role of a shared value invariant under high-load conditions. The OLC model addresses these gaps. Theoretical alignment with predictive processing accounts (Friston, 2010) is proposed: load amplification is interpreted as a reduction in top-down precision weighting, allowing bottom-up associative signals to exert stronger influence on opposition-channel output (Shiffrin & Schneider, 1977).</p> <p class="MsoNormal">The construct yielded functional benefits in adversarial reasoning and internal simulation while boundary integrity held. Once boundaries degraded, the same mechanisms produced decision interference and severe functional deterioration. Dissolution required deliberate multi-step disengagement, after which cognition transitioned to externalized structured frameworks. The contribution is a structured descriptive model with defined stability conditions, operationalized boundary indicators, and positioned SVA claims. Limitations of single-subject retrospective methodology are fully acknowledged; the case is presented as a candidate mechanism structure requiring multi-subject validation.</p> </div> |
| title | A Minimal Structural Model of Opposition–Load–Coupling Induced Instability in Cognitive Systems |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19929769 |