A Scale-Dependent Empirical Taxonomy for Deficit-Fractal Governance: Paper A Registry Update v3.2
Fuente:
Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | anglais |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866901287570767872 |
|---|---|
| author | Seol, Bin |
| author_facet | Seol, Bin |
| contents | <p>This record contains Paper A Registry Update v3.1 for the Deficit-Fractal Governance (DFG) Empirical Programme.</p> <p>This document updates the operating registry for the paper “A Scale-Dependent Empirical Taxonomy for Deficit-Fractal Governance.” It consolidates the Round 1–19 empirical programme into an authoritative v3.1 baseline for Paper A’s Tables 9–11, regime-boundary registry, Cross-Cell Consistency framework, and Regime-Search Methodology.</p> <p>The central conclusion is that the DFG empirical programme should be interpreted as a regime atlas rather than a theory cemetery. Cell-level incompatibility does not immediately imply theory-level falsification; instead, it triggers targeted search for operationalisation, substrate, observable, scale, or protocol mismatch. Theory-level retirement requires repeated incompatibility across exhaustively searched rescue paths.</p> <p>This v3.1 update integrates 24 experiment families, 31 executable experiment runs/sub-versions, 6 protocol scaffolds, 5 paper-quality syntheses, one cross-cell consistency note, and the Compatibility Atlas v1.3.</p> <p>Key updates include:<br>- H1-family registry update: neural σ≈1 operating-point criticality is supported across 24 independent neural subjects and 44 subject × protocol observations, while universal neural τ≈3/2 remains quarantined; a synthetic Manna + Watts-Strogatz low-dissipation joint regime is located and finite-size robust.<br>- H4-family registry update: financial critical slowing down is supported under substrate-matched observables across major financial crises.<br>- H5-family registry update: recovery-time H5 is reframed as a dynamical Jacobian spectral-radius prediction, while graph Laplacian λ₂ is retained as an objective-dependent connectivity predictor.<br>- Topology-Level Containment update: λ₂ predicts connectivity strength, with objective-dependent consequences for structural robustness and epidemic spread.<br>- Intervention Paradox update: the paradox is located in nonlinear model classes and not supported in linear systems.<br>- Cross-Cell Consistency framework: subject-level consistency across independent operationalisations is introduced as supportive evidence without propagating compatibility across cells.</p> <p>This record is part of the DFG Empirical Programme submission package and should be read together with the Compatibility Atlas v1.3.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19963076 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | A Scale-Dependent Empirical Taxonomy for Deficit-Fractal Governance: Paper A Registry Update v3.2 Seol, Bin Deficit-Fractal Governance DFG empirical taxonomy regime atlas cell-card protocol critical phenomena cascade universality critical slowing down spectral recovery topology containment intervention paradox cross-cell consistency complex systems governance theory <p>This record contains Paper A Registry Update v3.1 for the Deficit-Fractal Governance (DFG) Empirical Programme.</p> <p>This document updates the operating registry for the paper “A Scale-Dependent Empirical Taxonomy for Deficit-Fractal Governance.” It consolidates the Round 1–19 empirical programme into an authoritative v3.1 baseline for Paper A’s Tables 9–11, regime-boundary registry, Cross-Cell Consistency framework, and Regime-Search Methodology.</p> <p>The central conclusion is that the DFG empirical programme should be interpreted as a regime atlas rather than a theory cemetery. Cell-level incompatibility does not immediately imply theory-level falsification; instead, it triggers targeted search for operationalisation, substrate, observable, scale, or protocol mismatch. Theory-level retirement requires repeated incompatibility across exhaustively searched rescue paths.</p> <p>This v3.1 update integrates 24 experiment families, 31 executable experiment runs/sub-versions, 6 protocol scaffolds, 5 paper-quality syntheses, one cross-cell consistency note, and the Compatibility Atlas v1.3.</p> <p>Key updates include:<br>- H1-family registry update: neural σ≈1 operating-point criticality is supported across 24 independent neural subjects and 44 subject × protocol observations, while universal neural τ≈3/2 remains quarantined; a synthetic Manna + Watts-Strogatz low-dissipation joint regime is located and finite-size robust.<br>- H4-family registry update: financial critical slowing down is supported under substrate-matched observables across major financial crises.<br>- H5-family registry update: recovery-time H5 is reframed as a dynamical Jacobian spectral-radius prediction, while graph Laplacian λ₂ is retained as an objective-dependent connectivity predictor.<br>- Topology-Level Containment update: λ₂ predicts connectivity strength, with objective-dependent consequences for structural robustness and epidemic spread.<br>- Intervention Paradox update: the paradox is located in nonlinear model classes and not supported in linear systems.<br>- Cross-Cell Consistency framework: subject-level consistency across independent operationalisations is introduced as supportive evidence without propagating compatibility across cells.</p> <p>This record is part of the DFG Empirical Programme submission package and should be read together with the Compatibility Atlas v1.3.</p> |
| title | A Scale-Dependent Empirical Taxonomy for Deficit-Fractal Governance: Paper A Registry Update v3.2 |
| topic | Deficit-Fractal Governance DFG empirical taxonomy regime atlas cell-card protocol critical phenomena cascade universality critical slowing down spectral recovery topology containment intervention paradox cross-cell consistency complex systems governance theory |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19963076 |