Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Liu, Qingfeng
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866902036563361792
author Liu, Qingfeng
author_facet Liu, Qingfeng
contents <p>This record contains a working-paper version of “Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey.”</p> <p>The paper surveys technical and institutional mechanisms for preserving meaningful human and institutional control in AI-mediated environments. It organizes the literature across five layers of dependence: data, learning, action, exit, and ecosystem capacity. Mechanisms reviewed include on-device inference, federated adaptation, bounded agent architectures, machine unlearning, auditability, substitutability, and public compute.</p> <p>Using shared dimensions such as locality, participation in improvement, boundedness, reversibility, substitutability, and public verifiability, the survey argues that contemporary AI redistributes control across multiple technical boundaries rather than along a single axis such as safety or privacy. The resulting framework is intended to support the design and evaluation of governable AI systems.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19970390
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey
Liu, Qingfeng
Keywords: Sovereignty-Preserving AI; Human Sovereignty; AI Governance; Autonomous Agents; Federated Learning; Machine Unlearning; On-Device Inference; Public Compute; Reversibility; Auditability Subjects: Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science; Technology and Society
<p>This record contains a working-paper version of “Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey.”</p> <p>The paper surveys technical and institutional mechanisms for preserving meaningful human and institutional control in AI-mediated environments. It organizes the literature across five layers of dependence: data, learning, action, exit, and ecosystem capacity. Mechanisms reviewed include on-device inference, federated adaptation, bounded agent architectures, machine unlearning, auditability, substitutability, and public compute.</p> <p>Using shared dimensions such as locality, participation in improvement, boundedness, reversibility, substitutability, and public verifiability, the survey argues that contemporary AI redistributes control across multiple technical boundaries rather than along a single axis such as safety or privacy. The resulting framework is intended to support the design and evaluation of governable AI systems.</p>
title Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey
topic Keywords: Sovereignty-Preserving AI; Human Sovereignty; AI Governance; Autonomous Agents; Federated Learning; Machine Unlearning; On-Device Inference; Public Compute; Reversibility; Auditability Subjects: Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science; Technology and Society
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19970390