Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19976928 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901359592210432 |
|---|---|
| author | LI, WENXIN |
| author_facet | LI, WENXIN |
| contents | <p>Abstract<br>The CKS pattern's AI-as-substrate-mediator commitment is articulated in the parent foundational note<br>(A1.04) as a single role with five constitutive properties: (A) the LLM reads from substrate as primary<br>state; (B) the LLM writes under orchestration rules; (C) the LLM holds no substrate-relevant state<br>outside the substrate; (D) the LLM exercises no authority over substrate content; (E) LLM writes are<br>recorded with attribution. This note formalizes the structural property that makes the five-property<br>treatment compositional: each property has independent operational content — a counterfactual<br>implementation can fail any one while preserving the other four, with a specific failure mode — and yet<br>all five together are jointly necessary, since no proper subset suffices to keep the LLM in the mediator<br>position the source paper commits to. The note states the severability argument property by property,<br>the joint-necessity argument as a closed-loop dependency, distinguishes the severable-set frame from<br>three adjacent treatments, specifies how each cross-claim connection from §4.2 grounds in a specific<br>property-subset, and provides an operational test at the parent-frame level. The five property-specific<br>operational tests are deferred to A2.19–A2.23.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19976928 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Five Mediator Properties as Severable Architectural Commitments: A Decomposition Frame for the AI-as-Substrate-Mediator Role in CKS LI, WENXIN Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence <p>Abstract<br>The CKS pattern's AI-as-substrate-mediator commitment is articulated in the parent foundational note<br>(A1.04) as a single role with five constitutive properties: (A) the LLM reads from substrate as primary<br>state; (B) the LLM writes under orchestration rules; (C) the LLM holds no substrate-relevant state<br>outside the substrate; (D) the LLM exercises no authority over substrate content; (E) LLM writes are<br>recorded with attribution. This note formalizes the structural property that makes the five-property<br>treatment compositional: each property has independent operational content — a counterfactual<br>implementation can fail any one while preserving the other four, with a specific failure mode — and yet<br>all five together are jointly necessary, since no proper subset suffices to keep the LLM in the mediator<br>position the source paper commits to. The note states the severability argument property by property,<br>the joint-necessity argument as a closed-loop dependency, distinguishes the severable-set frame from<br>three adjacent treatments, specifies how each cross-claim connection from §4.2 grounds in a specific<br>property-subset, and provides an operational test at the parent-frame level. The five property-specific<br>operational tests are deferred to A2.19–A2.23.</p> |
| title | The Five Mediator Properties as Severable Architectural Commitments: A Decomposition Frame for the AI-as-Substrate-Mediator Role in CKS |
| topic | Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19976928 |