Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Huckstead, Jeffery
Format: Recurso digital
Language:
Published: Zenodo 2026
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20017869
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901368369840128
author Huckstead, Jeffery
author_facet Huckstead, Jeffery
contents <p>We identify a row-sector rebound structure in terminal adjacent-zero<br>spacing residuals near a $\sim 10^3$-row sector boundary identified<br>through an unbiased window-scale sweep, without prior specification of<br>the active modulus. Under a base-6 row-sector decomposition, the<br>structure is amplitude-dominant for modulus $1009$, while modulus $990$<br>remains co-significant under permutation guardrails. Follow-on audits<br>reject simple $h_1$-corridor gating and do not confirm local<br>$h_1 \times$ sector modulation. A synthetic null calibration shows that<br>apparent growth of interaction strength under finer local-$h_1$ binning<br>matches bin-resolution sparsity inflation rather than hidden<br>phase-conditioned structure. Thus the row-sector rebound and the<br>previously published $h_1$ packet organization are empirically distinct<br>on the observed terminal horizon.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20017869
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Orthogonal Row-Sector Rebound Dynamics in Terminal Zeta-Zero Spacing Residuals
Huckstead, Jeffery
<p>We identify a row-sector rebound structure in terminal adjacent-zero<br>spacing residuals near a $\sim 10^3$-row sector boundary identified<br>through an unbiased window-scale sweep, without prior specification of<br>the active modulus. Under a base-6 row-sector decomposition, the<br>structure is amplitude-dominant for modulus $1009$, while modulus $990$<br>remains co-significant under permutation guardrails. Follow-on audits<br>reject simple $h_1$-corridor gating and do not confirm local<br>$h_1 \times$ sector modulation. A synthetic null calibration shows that<br>apparent growth of interaction strength under finer local-$h_1$ binning<br>matches bin-resolution sparsity inflation rather than hidden<br>phase-conditioned structure. Thus the row-sector rebound and the<br>previously published $h_1$ packet organization are empirically distinct<br>on the observed terminal horizon.</p>
title Orthogonal Row-Sector Rebound Dynamics in Terminal Zeta-Zero Spacing Residuals
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20017869