Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: *1G. Krishnaveni, 2B. Sarushma, 3L. Samuel Raju, 4A. Rakesh, 5B. Sai Pavan
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2026
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20021540
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901760622198784
author *1G. Krishnaveni, 2B. Sarushma, 3L. Samuel Raju, 4A. Rakesh, 5B. Sai Pavan
author_facet *1G. Krishnaveni, 2B. Sarushma, 3L. Samuel Raju, 4A. Rakesh, 5B. Sai Pavan
contents <p>The massive increase in digital text has created a huge need for effective, automated summarization systems. Manually summarizing large documents takes significant time and is often not practical. Recent improvements in transformer neural language models have helped with abstractive summarization significantly. In this research, we assess the relative performance of three neural language models for automatic text summarization, specifically BART, T5, and GPT, using the same conditions for each model (compression ratio for conciseness and ROUGE metrics for summary quality). We propose a combined performance metric to compare this trade-off of length versus informativeness. Our experimental results demonstrate encoder-decoder architectures outperform autoregressive architectures in automatic summarization tasks. BART produced the highest quality summaries among all three models evaluated. Our study proposes an evaluation framework and methods for model selection to assist in the efficient development of practical summarization systems.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20021540
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF NEURAL LANGUAGE MODELS FOR AUTOMATED TEXT SUMMARIZATION
*1G. Krishnaveni, 2B. Sarushma, 3L. Samuel Raju, 4A. Rakesh, 5B. Sai Pavan
<p>The massive increase in digital text has created a huge need for effective, automated summarization systems. Manually summarizing large documents takes significant time and is often not practical. Recent improvements in transformer neural language models have helped with abstractive summarization significantly. In this research, we assess the relative performance of three neural language models for automatic text summarization, specifically BART, T5, and GPT, using the same conditions for each model (compression ratio for conciseness and ROUGE metrics for summary quality). We propose a combined performance metric to compare this trade-off of length versus informativeness. Our experimental results demonstrate encoder-decoder architectures outperform autoregressive architectures in automatic summarization tasks. BART produced the highest quality summaries among all three models evaluated. Our study proposes an evaluation framework and methods for model selection to assist in the efficient development of practical summarization systems.</p>
title PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF NEURAL LANGUAGE MODELS FOR AUTOMATED TEXT SUMMARIZATION
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20021540