From Modal Theory to General Emergence Mechanics - The Transition from Geometric-Dynamical Closure to Persistence Mechanics
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901558173630464 |
|---|---|
| author | Baldwin, Peter |
| author_facet | Baldwin, Peter |
| contents | <p>This paper explains the conceptual transition from earlier Modal Theory (MT) work<br>to the later framework of General Emergence Mechanics (GEM). Modal Theory pursued a<br>tightly closed flat-space programme built around preferred phase structure, attractor sta<br>bility, and geometric-dynamical self-consistency. General Emergence Mechanics inherits <br>several of those motivating ideas, especially the importance of stable attractors, coherence,<br>and vacuum preference, but reorganises them around a more general question: why do some<br>structures persist while others collapse, drift, or fail? The result is a shift from a framework<br>centred on total geometric closure to one centred on persistence, coherence shells, and the<br>three axes of depth, stiffness, and viscosity or relaxation time. The purpose of the present<br>note is not to restate either framework in full, but to identify what survived the transition,<br>what was abandoned, and why GEM emerged as the more transferable language</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20025817 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | From Modal Theory to General Emergence Mechanics - The Transition from Geometric-Dynamical Closure to Persistence Mechanics Baldwin, Peter vacuum structure attractor, closure framework transition coherence shell persistence mechanics General Emergence Mechanics GEM Modal Theory <p>This paper explains the conceptual transition from earlier Modal Theory (MT) work<br>to the later framework of General Emergence Mechanics (GEM). Modal Theory pursued a<br>tightly closed flat-space programme built around preferred phase structure, attractor sta<br>bility, and geometric-dynamical self-consistency. General Emergence Mechanics inherits <br>several of those motivating ideas, especially the importance of stable attractors, coherence,<br>and vacuum preference, but reorganises them around a more general question: why do some<br>structures persist while others collapse, drift, or fail? The result is a shift from a framework<br>centred on total geometric closure to one centred on persistence, coherence shells, and the<br>three axes of depth, stiffness, and viscosity or relaxation time. The purpose of the present<br>note is not to restate either framework in full, but to identify what survived the transition,<br>what was abandoned, and why GEM emerged as the more transferable language</p> |
| title | From Modal Theory to General Emergence Mechanics - The Transition from Geometric-Dynamical Closure to Persistence Mechanics |
| topic | vacuum structure attractor, closure framework transition coherence shell persistence mechanics General Emergence Mechanics GEM Modal Theory |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20025817 |