Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20029079 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Euthanasia, defined as the intentional termination of life to relieve suffering, occupies one of the most contentious spaces in contemporary medical law. It represents a complex intersection of ethical reasoning, patient autonomy, and legal regulation. With the rapid advancement of medical technology, life can now be prolonged even in circumstances where recovery is impossible, often resulting in extended suffering. This has intensified debates regarding whether individuals should have the right to end their lives with dignity. While proponents of euthanasia emphasize compassion, autonomy, and relief from suffering, critics highlight risks such as abuse, erosion of medical ethics, and societal implications. This paper critically examines euthanasia through ethical principles, comparative legal frameworks, and constitutional developments, with particular emphasis on India. It argues that euthanasia may be justified in limited circumstances but must be governed by stringent safeguards to ensure ethical integrity and prevent misuse.