Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20029208 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901311096619008 |
|---|---|
| author | LI, WENXIN |
| author_facet | LI, WENXIN |
| contents | <p>Abstract<br>The CKS pattern's path-retraceability commitment requires substrate content to carry sufficient provenance<br>that decisions can be answered from substrate alone — what was decided, by whom, under what authority,<br>with what rationale. A separate set of derivation notes formalizes the four accountability questions; this note<br>formalizes the substrate-side metadata infrastructure that supports them. Six fields constitute the<br>commitment: three unconditional (writer attribution, timestamp, antecedent reference) required for every<br>substrate write produced by deployment activity, and three conditional (rule reference, rationale, relationship<br>to contradicting content) required when their architectural conditions hold. The conditional structure is itself<br>part of the commitment: implementations that flatten it — treating all six as universally required, or treating<br>any of the conditions as deployment-configurable — fail the commitment in the architectural sense even<br>when their nominal field coverage is broader. The note defines each field, articulates the conditional<br>structure as architectural rather than operational, distinguishes the commitment from four adjacent<br>provenance patterns, names the load-bearing connections to downstream commitments, enumerates nine<br>failure modes, and provides an operational test.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20029208 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Six Provenance Metadata Fields per Substrate Write: The Architectural Infrastructure for Path Retraceability in the Coordination Knowledge Substrate Pattern LI, WENXIN Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence <p>Abstract<br>The CKS pattern's path-retraceability commitment requires substrate content to carry sufficient provenance<br>that decisions can be answered from substrate alone — what was decided, by whom, under what authority,<br>with what rationale. A separate set of derivation notes formalizes the four accountability questions; this note<br>formalizes the substrate-side metadata infrastructure that supports them. Six fields constitute the<br>commitment: three unconditional (writer attribution, timestamp, antecedent reference) required for every<br>substrate write produced by deployment activity, and three conditional (rule reference, rationale, relationship<br>to contradicting content) required when their architectural conditions hold. The conditional structure is itself<br>part of the commitment: implementations that flatten it — treating all six as universally required, or treating<br>any of the conditions as deployment-configurable — fail the commitment in the architectural sense even<br>when their nominal field coverage is broader. The note defines each field, articulates the conditional<br>structure as architectural rather than operational, distinguishes the commitment from four adjacent<br>provenance patterns, names the load-bearing connections to downstream commitments, enumerates nine<br>failure modes, and provides an operational test.</p> |
| title | The Six Provenance Metadata Fields per Substrate Write: The Architectural Infrastructure for Path Retraceability in the Coordination Knowledge Substrate Pattern |
| topic | Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20029208 |