The Absolute Medium Model and Its Complementary Realizations: From Substrate to Constraint and Process Ontologies

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: BARUA, SREEMAN
Format: Recurso digital
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901404217507840
author BARUA, SREEMAN
author_facet BARUA, SREEMAN
contents <p>The Absolute Medium (AM) model derives quantum mechanics, gauge fields, and gravity from a pre-geometric elastic continuum governed by the Maximal Invariance Principle (MIP) and the Non-Linear Elasticity Principle (NLEP). Here we show that the<strong> explanatory power of AM does not depend on its ontological commitment to a physical substrate.</strong></p> <p>We extract the invariant core of AM— Update Hierarchy, dissociative pressure ε, Unity of Persistence, buffers, τ6 bound, and the distinction between real and false layers—and demonstrate that two alternative test ontologies- the Constraint–Coherence Field (CCF) and the Process–Relaxation Ontology (PRO), preserve every invariant prediction while rejecting medium realism.</p> <p>Finally, we formulate the <strong>Persistence Axiom (PA), a single rate-based condition that generates all three frameworks</strong> as distinct interpretations. This stress test proves that AM discovered a genuine structural law of coherence.</p> <p>The AM model remains the most concrete realisation, but <strong>its core contribution is the discovery of a universal persistence law.</strong> Future empirical work may discriminate among these ontologies, but their structural equivalence already demonstrates that the AM framework has reached a level of maturity comparable to the deepest principles in physics.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20038746
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle The Absolute Medium Model and Its Complementary Realizations: From Substrate to Constraint and Process Ontologies
BARUA, SREEMAN
Rate based condotion
AM Model
Sreeman Barua
Dissociative pressure
Update Hierarchy
MIP
NLEP
Law of Coherence
<p>The Absolute Medium (AM) model derives quantum mechanics, gauge fields, and gravity from a pre-geometric elastic continuum governed by the Maximal Invariance Principle (MIP) and the Non-Linear Elasticity Principle (NLEP). Here we show that the<strong> explanatory power of AM does not depend on its ontological commitment to a physical substrate.</strong></p> <p>We extract the invariant core of AM— Update Hierarchy, dissociative pressure ε, Unity of Persistence, buffers, τ6 bound, and the distinction between real and false layers—and demonstrate that two alternative test ontologies- the Constraint–Coherence Field (CCF) and the Process–Relaxation Ontology (PRO), preserve every invariant prediction while rejecting medium realism.</p> <p>Finally, we formulate the <strong>Persistence Axiom (PA), a single rate-based condition that generates all three frameworks</strong> as distinct interpretations. This stress test proves that AM discovered a genuine structural law of coherence.</p> <p>The AM model remains the most concrete realisation, but <strong>its core contribution is the discovery of a universal persistence law.</strong> Future empirical work may discriminate among these ontologies, but their structural equivalence already demonstrates that the AM framework has reached a level of maturity comparable to the deepest principles in physics.</p>
title The Absolute Medium Model and Its Complementary Realizations: From Substrate to Constraint and Process Ontologies
topic Rate based condotion
AM Model
Sreeman Barua
Dissociative pressure
Update Hierarchy
MIP
NLEP
Law of Coherence
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20038746