Are Quantum States Ontic or Epistemic? A Definitive Answer. English version.
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866902251312775168 |
|---|---|
| author | Lierenfeldt, Rudolf |
| author_facet | Lierenfeldt, Rudolf |
| contents | <p>Even after a hundred years of quantum theory, the true meaning of the quantum state has not yet been clearly understood. Does a pure quantum state, described by a wave function φ, represent a real physical quantity, comparable to position and momentum in classical mechanics, or does it, even as a pure state, only have a statistical significance, similar to a probability distribution?</p> <p>In this paper, we show that there is no contradiction between these two interpretations. Two concepts must be distinguished here: on the one hand, physical objects, which have a finite lifetime, and on the other hand, subsystems (i.e., tensor factors) of the Hilbert space of the universe. A complete description of an object at a point in time t is given by a linear subspace A of its Hilbert space, which, in the case of dim A = 1, can be specified by a wave function φ as A = [φ]. However, for every subsystem Q, for each point in time t, and for every condition B, the conditional quantum state W = W(Q,t|B) can be defined as a statistical operator on the Hilbert space of Q. Using W, certain (conditional) probabilities can be calculated. In the case of rank W = 1, the operator W can also be specified by a wave function φ, namely as W = |φ><φ|.</p> <p>It is the subsystems of the Hilbert space that play the role of "quantum systems" in the Copenhagen formalism, and the quantum states defined for them behave exactly as described by this formalism.</p> <p>If a wave function φ represents the description of a (quantum) object, then we are dealing with a real physical property, that is, φ plays an "ontic" role. However, if φ represents a quantum state, then its role is merely "statistical". If, in this case, condition B corresponds to the knowledge of a subject, φ plays an "epistemic" role.</p> <p>Additional Remarks</p> <p>The reasoning in this paper is largely based on a new systematic approach to solving the interpretation problem of quantum theory, which was originally published in 2018 (in German) under the title "Realistische Quantentheorie".</p> <p>A comprehensive account of this approach (in English) was published in February 2026 under the title "Realistic Quantum Theory: Solving the Interpretation Problem". It is available in the Zenodo repository (zenodo.18644694, see link below under "Related works" / "References").</p> <p>The present document provides an English version of an earlier paper in German under the same title, which is also available in the Zenodo repository (zenodo.10694813, see link below).</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20055790 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Are Quantum States Ontic or Epistemic? A Definitive Answer. English version. Lierenfeldt, Rudolf Foundations of Physics Mathematical Quantum Theory Interpretation Problem Quantum State Quantum System Quantum Object Ontic State Statistical State Epistemic State <p>Even after a hundred years of quantum theory, the true meaning of the quantum state has not yet been clearly understood. Does a pure quantum state, described by a wave function φ, represent a real physical quantity, comparable to position and momentum in classical mechanics, or does it, even as a pure state, only have a statistical significance, similar to a probability distribution?</p> <p>In this paper, we show that there is no contradiction between these two interpretations. Two concepts must be distinguished here: on the one hand, physical objects, which have a finite lifetime, and on the other hand, subsystems (i.e., tensor factors) of the Hilbert space of the universe. A complete description of an object at a point in time t is given by a linear subspace A of its Hilbert space, which, in the case of dim A = 1, can be specified by a wave function φ as A = [φ]. However, for every subsystem Q, for each point in time t, and for every condition B, the conditional quantum state W = W(Q,t|B) can be defined as a statistical operator on the Hilbert space of Q. Using W, certain (conditional) probabilities can be calculated. In the case of rank W = 1, the operator W can also be specified by a wave function φ, namely as W = |φ><φ|.</p> <p>It is the subsystems of the Hilbert space that play the role of "quantum systems" in the Copenhagen formalism, and the quantum states defined for them behave exactly as described by this formalism.</p> <p>If a wave function φ represents the description of a (quantum) object, then we are dealing with a real physical property, that is, φ plays an "ontic" role. However, if φ represents a quantum state, then its role is merely "statistical". If, in this case, condition B corresponds to the knowledge of a subject, φ plays an "epistemic" role.</p> <p>Additional Remarks</p> <p>The reasoning in this paper is largely based on a new systematic approach to solving the interpretation problem of quantum theory, which was originally published in 2018 (in German) under the title "Realistische Quantentheorie".</p> <p>A comprehensive account of this approach (in English) was published in February 2026 under the title "Realistic Quantum Theory: Solving the Interpretation Problem". It is available in the Zenodo repository (zenodo.18644694, see link below under "Related works" / "References").</p> <p>The present document provides an English version of an earlier paper in German under the same title, which is also available in the Zenodo repository (zenodo.10694813, see link below).</p> |
| title | Are Quantum States Ontic or Epistemic? A Definitive Answer. English version. |
| topic | Foundations of Physics Mathematical Quantum Theory Interpretation Problem Quantum State Quantum System Quantum Object Ontic State Statistical State Epistemic State |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20055790 |