Hypopomus Gill 1864

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carl J. Ferraris, Jr., Santana, Carlos David de, Vari, Richard P.
Format: Recurso digital
Published: Zenodo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866902007499980800
author Carl J. Ferraris, Jr.
Santana, Carlos David de
Vari, Richard P.
author_facet Carl J. Ferraris, Jr.
Santana, Carlos David de
Vari, Richard P.
contents <p><i>HYPOPOMUS</i> Gill, 1864</p><p>(1 species)</p><p><i>Hypopomus</i> Gill, 1864: 152. Type species: <i>Rhamphichthys mulleri</i> Kaup, 1856. Type by monotypy. Gender: masculine.</p><p><i>Brachyrhamphichthys</i> Günther, 1870: 6. Type species: <i>Rhamphichthys artedi</i> Kaup, 1856. Type by subsequent designation by Eigenmann, Ward (1905: 169). Gender: masculine. Proposed as a subgenus of <i>Rhamphichthys.</i></p><p><i>Parupygus</i> Hoedeman, 1962a: 58. Type species: <i>Parupygus savannensis</i> Hoedeman, 1962. Type by monotypy. Gender: masculine.</p><p>Remarks: The gender of <i>Hypopomus</i> was not stated in Gill (1864); and has been treated as feminine in Mago-Leccia (1994), Eschmeyer (1998), and Eschmeyer <i>et al.</i> (2016). However, the name appears to be derived from the transliterated Greek word poma (operculum), that was assigned a latinized suffix (pomus), thereby falling under the provisions of Art. 30.1.3 of ICZN (1999), which requires that the genus be treated as masculine.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20087965
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2017
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Hypopomus Gill 1864
Carl J. Ferraris, Jr.
Santana, Carlos David de
Vari, Richard P.
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Gymnotiformes
Hypopomidae
Hypopomus
<p><i>HYPOPOMUS</i> Gill, 1864</p><p>(1 species)</p><p><i>Hypopomus</i> Gill, 1864: 152. Type species: <i>Rhamphichthys mulleri</i> Kaup, 1856. Type by monotypy. Gender: masculine.</p><p><i>Brachyrhamphichthys</i> Günther, 1870: 6. Type species: <i>Rhamphichthys artedi</i> Kaup, 1856. Type by subsequent designation by Eigenmann, Ward (1905: 169). Gender: masculine. Proposed as a subgenus of <i>Rhamphichthys.</i></p><p><i>Parupygus</i> Hoedeman, 1962a: 58. Type species: <i>Parupygus savannensis</i> Hoedeman, 1962. Type by monotypy. Gender: masculine.</p><p>Remarks: The gender of <i>Hypopomus</i> was not stated in Gill (1864); and has been treated as feminine in Mago-Leccia (1994), Eschmeyer (1998), and Eschmeyer <i>et al.</i> (2016). However, the name appears to be derived from the transliterated Greek word poma (operculum), that was assigned a latinized suffix (pomus), thereby falling under the provisions of Art. 30.1.3 of ICZN (1999), which requires that the genus be treated as masculine.</p>
title Hypopomus Gill 1864
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Gymnotiformes
Hypopomidae
Hypopomus
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20087965