Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20096852 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901881582780416 |
|---|---|
| author | Evoluit, M. |
| author_facet | Evoluit, M. |
| contents | <p>This article reconstructs the logical genesis of Evoluism. Rather than presenting it as a new doctrine or final worldview, it shows how <em><strong>Evoluism emerges as a necessary philosophical discipline arising from the internal logic of thought itself.</strong></em></p> <p>The argument begins with the most basic condition of determinate thought: distinction. No assertion, explanation, or truth-claim is possible without it. Yet distinctions acquire semantic force only when retained under specifiable conditions of applicability. These conditions form structured fields — called worlds — in which certain distinctions become operative while others remain inoperative.</p> <p>Every world is necessarily selective. What grants it determinacy also limits its scope. Because no conditioned and selective world can legitimately occupy the position of Reality, Reality is understood here not as another world, not as the sum of worlds, and not as a hidden object, but as the structural limit that prevents any world from becoming the whole.</p> <p>From this Reality/World asymmetry follows the structural impossibility of strong universal theory: no theory can extend one determinate set of distinctions across all domains without either preserving its conditions — and thereby ceasing to be strongly universal — or suppressing those conditions — and thereby losing determinacy.</p> <p>Evoluism arises precisely at this point — as the discipline that preserves the force of distinctions and the integrity of different registers without allowing any of them to claim final authority over Reality. It offers not another total picture of the world, but a post-totalising orientation: a way of thinking that remains rigorous, truthful, and meaningful without the need for final closure.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20096852 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Logical Genesis of Evoluism Evoluit, M. Evoluism logical genesis distinction conditions of applicability operative distinctions selectivity of worlds Reality as limit Reality/World asymmetry strong universal theory semantic determinacy post-totalising orientation non-totalising thought ontology metaphysics philosophy of science <p>This article reconstructs the logical genesis of Evoluism. Rather than presenting it as a new doctrine or final worldview, it shows how <em><strong>Evoluism emerges as a necessary philosophical discipline arising from the internal logic of thought itself.</strong></em></p> <p>The argument begins with the most basic condition of determinate thought: distinction. No assertion, explanation, or truth-claim is possible without it. Yet distinctions acquire semantic force only when retained under specifiable conditions of applicability. These conditions form structured fields — called worlds — in which certain distinctions become operative while others remain inoperative.</p> <p>Every world is necessarily selective. What grants it determinacy also limits its scope. Because no conditioned and selective world can legitimately occupy the position of Reality, Reality is understood here not as another world, not as the sum of worlds, and not as a hidden object, but as the structural limit that prevents any world from becoming the whole.</p> <p>From this Reality/World asymmetry follows the structural impossibility of strong universal theory: no theory can extend one determinate set of distinctions across all domains without either preserving its conditions — and thereby ceasing to be strongly universal — or suppressing those conditions — and thereby losing determinacy.</p> <p>Evoluism arises precisely at this point — as the discipline that preserves the force of distinctions and the integrity of different registers without allowing any of them to claim final authority over Reality. It offers not another total picture of the world, but a post-totalising orientation: a way of thinking that remains rigorous, truthful, and meaningful without the need for final closure.</p> |
| title | The Logical Genesis of Evoluism |
| topic | Evoluism logical genesis distinction conditions of applicability operative distinctions selectivity of worlds Reality as limit Reality/World asymmetry strong universal theory semantic determinacy post-totalising orientation non-totalising thought ontology metaphysics philosophy of science |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20096852 |