Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Accesso online: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20157131 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901750933356544 |
|---|---|
| author | Tantisukarom, Chaiya |
| author_facet | Tantisukarom, Chaiya |
| contents | <p>This article contrasts the mathematical methodologies of Bernhard Riemann and David Hilbert. We argue that Riemann’s 1859 approach represents a ``NotebookLM'' style of grounded, structural truth, while Hilbert’s subsequent framing of the Riemann Hypothesis (Problem \#8) mirrors the hallucinatory and managerial flaws of ungrounded Generative AI.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20157131 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Structural Architect vs. The Managerial Hallucinator: A Reinterpretation of Riemann and Hilbert in the Age of GenAI Tantisukarom, Chaiya <p>This article contrasts the mathematical methodologies of Bernhard Riemann and David Hilbert. We argue that Riemann’s 1859 approach represents a ``NotebookLM'' style of grounded, structural truth, while Hilbert’s subsequent framing of the Riemann Hypothesis (Problem \#8) mirrors the hallucinatory and managerial flaws of ungrounded Generative AI.</p> |
| title | The Structural Architect vs. The Managerial Hallucinator: A Reinterpretation of Riemann and Hilbert in the Age of GenAI |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20157131 |