General Theory of Finite Descent Authority

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carroll, Jeremy H.
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901652810760192
author Carroll, Jeremy H.
author_facet Carroll, Jeremy H.
contents <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">Finite Descent Authority (FDA) is a formal doctrine of operational authority. It states that a proposal does not become authority-bearing merely by being represented, predicted, generated, routed, explained, or embedded in a global structure. A proposal earns authority only when it enters a finite certified regime, is verified inside that regime, and terminalizes into a declared authority-bearing status.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">The central normal form is: Auth(p) = tau_s(V_s(P_s, eta_s(p))), where s = rho(p) and P_s = D(s).</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">Here, rho routes a proposal to a sector, eta_s realizes it inside that sector, D constructs the finite descent packet, V verifies the packet-relative candidate fiber, and tau terminalizes the verified result into an authority-bearing or non-authority status.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">The paper develops the core FDA principles: proposal non-authority, finite descent necessity, authority factorization, descent packet soundness, and terminal authority. It also relates FDA to Finite Obstruction Calculus (FOC), where obstruction calculus supplies the local verifier and FDA supplies the global authority doctrine. The work separates operational authority from fluency, representation, fallback output, completion, and heuristic success.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">This publication-facing version keeps the main definitions and theorem statements in the publication spine. Full proofs are preserved separately in the proof archive, while implementation-specific ledgers, LLM/Kaggle material, quantum examples, and speculative extensions are kept outside the main paper.</span></p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20195157
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle General Theory of Finite Descent Authority
Carroll, Jeremy H.
Finite Descent Authority
Finite Obstruction Calculus
applied proof theory
category theory
finite reasoning
Semantics
obstruction calculus
obstruction theory
Mathematical logic
verification theory
formal methods
finite certified regime
proof certificates
authority factorization
LLM
no silent mutation
finite authority systems
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">Finite Descent Authority (FDA) is a formal doctrine of operational authority. It states that a proposal does not become authority-bearing merely by being represented, predicted, generated, routed, explained, or embedded in a global structure. A proposal earns authority only when it enters a finite certified regime, is verified inside that regime, and terminalizes into a declared authority-bearing status.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">The central normal form is: Auth(p) = tau_s(V_s(P_s, eta_s(p))), where s = rho(p) and P_s = D(s).</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">Here, rho routes a proposal to a sector, eta_s realizes it inside that sector, D constructs the finite descent packet, V verifies the packet-relative candidate fiber, and tau terminalizes the verified result into an authority-bearing or non-authority status.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">The paper develops the core FDA principles: proposal non-authority, finite descent necessity, authority factorization, descent packet soundness, and terminal authority. It also relates FDA to Finite Obstruction Calculus (FOC), where obstruction calculus supplies the local verifier and FDA supplies the global authority doctrine. The work separates operational authority from fluency, representation, fallback output, completion, and heuristic success.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">This publication-facing version keeps the main definitions and theorem statements in the publication spine. Full proofs are preserved separately in the proof archive, while implementation-specific ledgers, LLM/Kaggle material, quantum examples, and speculative extensions are kept outside the main paper.</span></p>
title General Theory of Finite Descent Authority
topic Finite Descent Authority
Finite Obstruction Calculus
applied proof theory
category theory
finite reasoning
Semantics
obstruction calculus
obstruction theory
Mathematical logic
verification theory
formal methods
finite certified regime
proof certificates
authority factorization
LLM
no silent mutation
finite authority systems
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20195157