RCS-PAI-001 — Persistence and Interlock Artifact Set (PAI): Intent Persistence Records, Independent Boundary Records, Recoverability-Gated Interlocks, and Proof-of-Persistence / Proof-of-Stop Logs Under Recoverability-Constrained Systems
Fuente:
Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866901548290801664 |
|---|---|
| author | Sanchez, Noelia Interval Studio |
| author_facet | Sanchez, Noelia Interval Studio |
| contents | <p>This publication defines the Persistence and Interlock Artifact Set (PAI), a recoverability-constrained operational artifact architecture intended to preserve continuity, admissibility visibility, independently attestable operational boundaries, runtime persistence integrity, and evidence-preserving execution under machine-speed civilization.</p> <p>The publication establishes:</p> <ul> <li>Intent Persistence Records (IPR)</li> <li>Independent Boundary Records (IBR)</li> <li>Recoverability-Gated Interlocks (RGI)</li> <li>Proof-of-Persistence / Proof-of-Stop Logs (PPSL)</li> </ul> <p>The framework introduces:</p> <ul> <li>recoverability-visible runtime execution</li> <li>runtime admissibility determination</li> <li>continuity-preserving operational evidence</li> <li>independently visible operational boundaries</li> <li>recoverability-aware operational memory</li> <li>continuity-safe escalation systems</li> <li>machine-speed recoverability gating</li> <li>persistence-preserving runtime architectures</li> <li>pre-irreversibility operational artifacts</li> <li>recoverability-bounded execution systems</li> </ul> <p>The publication further formalizes:</p> <ul> <li>runtime state transition architectures</li> <li>recoverability-preserving runtime topology</li> <li>persistence chains</li> <li>escalation architectures</li> <li>proof-generation systems</li> <li>admissibility-aware interlocks</li> <li>continuity-preserving infrastructure logic</li> </ul> <p>The foundational invariant remains:</p> <p>“A system may continue only while recoverability can be established in time under real conditions sufficient to prevent irreversible transition.”</p> <p>Where recoverability cannot be established:</p> <p>-> continuation becomes non-admissible<br>-> execution must restrict, escalate, contain, or stop according to continuity-safe operational conditions</p> <p>The publication functions additionally as:</p> <ul> <li>operational systems architecture</li> <li>runtime continuity framework</li> <li>defensive publication</li> <li>prior-art disclosure</li> <li>recoverability-preserving infrastructure architecture</li> <li>machine-speed operational admissibility framework</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>This publication intentionally excludes deployment-sensitive implementation details, restricted enforcement architectures, hardware actuation pathways, runtime threshold internals, and infrastructure-sensitive operational controls.</p> <p>The publication defines only the public-safe architectural layer of the Persistence and Interlock Artifact Set (PAI).</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20278249 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | RCS-PAI-001 — Persistence and Interlock Artifact Set (PAI): Intent Persistence Records, Independent Boundary Records, Recoverability-Gated Interlocks, and Proof-of-Persistence / Proof-of-Stop Logs Under Recoverability-Constrained Systems Sanchez, Noelia Interval Studio Irreversibility Recoverability Admissibility Complex system <p>This publication defines the Persistence and Interlock Artifact Set (PAI), a recoverability-constrained operational artifact architecture intended to preserve continuity, admissibility visibility, independently attestable operational boundaries, runtime persistence integrity, and evidence-preserving execution under machine-speed civilization.</p> <p>The publication establishes:</p> <ul> <li>Intent Persistence Records (IPR)</li> <li>Independent Boundary Records (IBR)</li> <li>Recoverability-Gated Interlocks (RGI)</li> <li>Proof-of-Persistence / Proof-of-Stop Logs (PPSL)</li> </ul> <p>The framework introduces:</p> <ul> <li>recoverability-visible runtime execution</li> <li>runtime admissibility determination</li> <li>continuity-preserving operational evidence</li> <li>independently visible operational boundaries</li> <li>recoverability-aware operational memory</li> <li>continuity-safe escalation systems</li> <li>machine-speed recoverability gating</li> <li>persistence-preserving runtime architectures</li> <li>pre-irreversibility operational artifacts</li> <li>recoverability-bounded execution systems</li> </ul> <p>The publication further formalizes:</p> <ul> <li>runtime state transition architectures</li> <li>recoverability-preserving runtime topology</li> <li>persistence chains</li> <li>escalation architectures</li> <li>proof-generation systems</li> <li>admissibility-aware interlocks</li> <li>continuity-preserving infrastructure logic</li> </ul> <p>The foundational invariant remains:</p> <p>“A system may continue only while recoverability can be established in time under real conditions sufficient to prevent irreversible transition.”</p> <p>Where recoverability cannot be established:</p> <p>-> continuation becomes non-admissible<br>-> execution must restrict, escalate, contain, or stop according to continuity-safe operational conditions</p> <p>The publication functions additionally as:</p> <ul> <li>operational systems architecture</li> <li>runtime continuity framework</li> <li>defensive publication</li> <li>prior-art disclosure</li> <li>recoverability-preserving infrastructure architecture</li> <li>machine-speed operational admissibility framework</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>This publication intentionally excludes deployment-sensitive implementation details, restricted enforcement architectures, hardware actuation pathways, runtime threshold internals, and infrastructure-sensitive operational controls.</p> <p>The publication defines only the public-safe architectural layer of the Persistence and Interlock Artifact Set (PAI).</p> |
| title | RCS-PAI-001 — Persistence and Interlock Artifact Set (PAI): Intent Persistence Records, Independent Boundary Records, Recoverability-Gated Interlocks, and Proof-of-Persistence / Proof-of-Stop Logs Under Recoverability-Constrained Systems |
| topic | Irreversibility Recoverability Admissibility Complex system |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20278249 |