Recoverability-Constrained Reality, Authenticity, and Epistemic Continuity Framework (RCRAECF-001) A Unified Framework for Reality Correspondence, Synthetic-State Admissibility, Provenance Preservation, and Epistemic Continuity Under Irreversibility Constraints
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901997440991232 |
|---|---|
| author | Sanchez, Noelia Interval Studio, United Kingdom |
| author_facet | Sanchez, Noelia Interval Studio, United Kingdom |
| contents | <p>This publication establishes a recoverability-constrained framework for reality authentication, synthetic-state admissibility, provenance continuity, recursive evaluator admissibility, semantic continuity preservation, observer recoverability, synchronization integrity, and operational truth preservation under irreversibility constraints.</p> <p>The framework formalizes reality not merely as a perceptual, informational, representational, or media condition, but as a continuity-critical operational substrate whose admissibility depends upon preserving the ability of humans, institutions, scientific systems, autonomous systems, governance systems, legal systems, and civilizational coordination systems to distinguish recoverably real operational states from synthetic, manipulated, deceptive, simulated, miscontextualized, or unverifiable representations before irreversible harm occurs.</p> <p>The framework establishes that representation systems become non-admissible when:</p> <ul> <li>synthetic media is presented as real without recoverable disclosure;</li> <li>provenance chains collapse before verification can occur;</li> <li>semantic continuity destabilizes;</li> <li>evaluators become non-verifiable;</li> <li>recursive ambiguity propagates faster than correction;</li> <li>synthetic states become operationally indistinguishable from reality;</li> <li>institutions continue acting upon unrecoverable representations;</li> <li>synchronization fractures propagate across observers or systems;</li> <li>incompleteness is concealed as certainty;</li> <li>or operational continuation persists despite unrecoverable epistemic instability.</li> </ul> <p>The framework defines reality correspondence, provenance survivability, semantic continuity, observer recoverability, recursive admissibility, synchronization integrity, bounded incompleteness stabilization, and recoverable authenticity disclosure as mandatory operational conditions for any system that produces, distributes, certifies, governs, monetizes, interprets, archives, or acts upon representations of reality.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20350277 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Recoverability-Constrained Reality, Authenticity, and Epistemic Continuity Framework (RCRAECF-001) A Unified Framework for Reality Correspondence, Synthetic-State Admissibility, Provenance Preservation, and Epistemic Continuity Under Irreversibility Constraints Sanchez, Noelia Interval Studio, United Kingdom recoverability reality correspondence epistemic continuity synthetic-state admissibility provenance continuity recursive admissibility semantic continuity observer recoverability synchronization integrity bounded incompleteness representation integrity evaluator validity authenticity verification synthetic media deepfakes operational truth ontology continuity continuity science irreversibility constraints civilizational systems <p>This publication establishes a recoverability-constrained framework for reality authentication, synthetic-state admissibility, provenance continuity, recursive evaluator admissibility, semantic continuity preservation, observer recoverability, synchronization integrity, and operational truth preservation under irreversibility constraints.</p> <p>The framework formalizes reality not merely as a perceptual, informational, representational, or media condition, but as a continuity-critical operational substrate whose admissibility depends upon preserving the ability of humans, institutions, scientific systems, autonomous systems, governance systems, legal systems, and civilizational coordination systems to distinguish recoverably real operational states from synthetic, manipulated, deceptive, simulated, miscontextualized, or unverifiable representations before irreversible harm occurs.</p> <p>The framework establishes that representation systems become non-admissible when:</p> <ul> <li>synthetic media is presented as real without recoverable disclosure;</li> <li>provenance chains collapse before verification can occur;</li> <li>semantic continuity destabilizes;</li> <li>evaluators become non-verifiable;</li> <li>recursive ambiguity propagates faster than correction;</li> <li>synthetic states become operationally indistinguishable from reality;</li> <li>institutions continue acting upon unrecoverable representations;</li> <li>synchronization fractures propagate across observers or systems;</li> <li>incompleteness is concealed as certainty;</li> <li>or operational continuation persists despite unrecoverable epistemic instability.</li> </ul> <p>The framework defines reality correspondence, provenance survivability, semantic continuity, observer recoverability, recursive admissibility, synchronization integrity, bounded incompleteness stabilization, and recoverable authenticity disclosure as mandatory operational conditions for any system that produces, distributes, certifies, governs, monetizes, interprets, archives, or acts upon representations of reality.</p> |
| title | Recoverability-Constrained Reality, Authenticity, and Epistemic Continuity Framework (RCRAECF-001) A Unified Framework for Reality Correspondence, Synthetic-State Admissibility, Provenance Preservation, and Epistemic Continuity Under Irreversibility Constraints |
| topic | recoverability reality correspondence epistemic continuity synthetic-state admissibility provenance continuity recursive admissibility semantic continuity observer recoverability synchronization integrity bounded incompleteness representation integrity evaluator validity authenticity verification synthetic media deepfakes operational truth ontology continuity continuity science irreversibility constraints civilizational systems |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20350277 |