Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20387931 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866902152417378304 |
|---|---|
| author | Arp, Hans Peter H. |
| author_facet | Arp, Hans Peter H. |
| contents | <p>A case study of ZeroPM for the Special Session: "Uniting the Silos: Learnings from Multi-stakeholder Collaborations to Advance Chemical Safety Assessments". </p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chemical safety assessments are shaped by a wide range of actors—regulatory authorities, policy makers, academia, industry (including consultancies and contract research organizations), NGOs, trade associations, non-profits, and even social media influencers. Each brings distinct expertise, priorities, and perspectives. While these roles sometimes align, they often diverge, leading to tension, inefficiencies, and occasionally legal disputes. At the same time, growing concerns about human health and environmental protection demand collaborative approaches that transcend siloed efforts.</p> <p><u>Scope</u></p> <p>This session will combine case studies of multi-stakeholder collaborations in chemical safety assessment with conceptual insights from disciplines such as environmental sociology, political science, and ethics. Case studies will illustrate why collaborations were initiated, who participated, what outcomes were achieved, and lessons learned. Conceptual contributions will help unpack the dynamics of co-creation and stakeholder engagement.</p> <p>Importantly, the session will be interactive, actively engaging the audience in discussion and reflection. Participants will be invited to share their own experiences, challenges, and ideas, ensuring that the dialogue goes beyond presentations to co-create insights for future collaborative practices.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20387931 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Use of evidence multi-stakeholder participation to minimize pollution of PFAS and PMT substances Arp, Hans Peter H. <p>A case study of ZeroPM for the Special Session: "Uniting the Silos: Learnings from Multi-stakeholder Collaborations to Advance Chemical Safety Assessments". </p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chemical safety assessments are shaped by a wide range of actors—regulatory authorities, policy makers, academia, industry (including consultancies and contract research organizations), NGOs, trade associations, non-profits, and even social media influencers. Each brings distinct expertise, priorities, and perspectives. While these roles sometimes align, they often diverge, leading to tension, inefficiencies, and occasionally legal disputes. At the same time, growing concerns about human health and environmental protection demand collaborative approaches that transcend siloed efforts.</p> <p><u>Scope</u></p> <p>This session will combine case studies of multi-stakeholder collaborations in chemical safety assessment with conceptual insights from disciplines such as environmental sociology, political science, and ethics. Case studies will illustrate why collaborations were initiated, who participated, what outcomes were achieved, and lessons learned. Conceptual contributions will help unpack the dynamics of co-creation and stakeholder engagement.</p> <p>Importantly, the session will be interactive, actively engaging the audience in discussion and reflection. Participants will be invited to share their own experiences, challenges, and ideas, ensuring that the dialogue goes beyond presentations to co-create insights for future collaborative practices.</p> |
| title | Use of evidence multi-stakeholder participation to minimize pollution of PFAS and PMT substances |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20387931 |