Gettier, Epistemic Closure, and the Necessity of N₁: A TNA Critique of Justified True Belief

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bresciano, Claudio
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866902147031891968
author Bresciano, Claudio
author_facet Bresciano, Claudio
contents <p><strong>This paper analyzes the Gettier problem through the framework of the Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), demonstrating that the failure of Justified True Belief (JTB) is an epistemological manifestation of Failure of Local Closure. We argue that internally accessible cognitive structures (<span class="math-inline">$N_0$</span>) are inherently insufficient to guarantee genuine knowledge without a non-derivable external legitimizing infrastructure (<span class="math-inline">$N_1$</span>).</strong> By reinterpreting classical counterexamples, we show that "epistemic luck" is not a superficial design flaw, but structural proof that no sufficiently complex cognitive system can self-generate its own legitimacy or anchor its operational coherence to truth non-accidentally. Under TNA, knowledge is redefined not as an accumulation of justified internal data (<span class="math-inline">$\Delta$</span>), but as an state of structural admissibility licensed by a deeper participation in reality. Ultimately, the Gettier crisis reveals that cognition cannot achieve complete self-closure, positioning the <span class="math-inline">$N_1$</span> operator as a permanent, non-smooth infrastructure necessary to rescue epistemology from accidental truth and systemic incoherence.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20401478
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Gettier, Epistemic Closure, and the Necessity of N₁: A TNA Critique of Justified True Belief
Bresciano, Claudio
Edmund Gettier, Justified True Belief (JTB), Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), Failure of Local Closure, $N_1$ epistemic operator, Epistemic luck, Cognitive self-sufficiency, Realizability constraints
<p><strong>This paper analyzes the Gettier problem through the framework of the Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), demonstrating that the failure of Justified True Belief (JTB) is an epistemological manifestation of Failure of Local Closure. We argue that internally accessible cognitive structures (<span class="math-inline">$N_0$</span>) are inherently insufficient to guarantee genuine knowledge without a non-derivable external legitimizing infrastructure (<span class="math-inline">$N_1$</span>).</strong> By reinterpreting classical counterexamples, we show that "epistemic luck" is not a superficial design flaw, but structural proof that no sufficiently complex cognitive system can self-generate its own legitimacy or anchor its operational coherence to truth non-accidentally. Under TNA, knowledge is redefined not as an accumulation of justified internal data (<span class="math-inline">$\Delta$</span>), but as an state of structural admissibility licensed by a deeper participation in reality. Ultimately, the Gettier crisis reveals that cognition cannot achieve complete self-closure, positioning the <span class="math-inline">$N_1$</span> operator as a permanent, non-smooth infrastructure necessary to rescue epistemology from accidental truth and systemic incoherence.</p>
title Gettier, Epistemic Closure, and the Necessity of N₁: A TNA Critique of Justified True Belief
topic Edmund Gettier, Justified True Belief (JTB), Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), Failure of Local Closure, $N_1$ epistemic operator, Epistemic luck, Cognitive self-sufficiency, Realizability constraints
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20401478