Empirical Comparison of Standard Security Stack (AV/EDR/IPS/SIEM) vs S-KERNEL V3 (NC/SP V3) Under 10,000 Concurrent Cyber-Attacks – V3 Benchmark
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866902143640797184 |
|---|---|
| author | benhadid, OUTAIL |
| author_facet | benhadid, OUTAIL |
| contents | <h2><span class="">ABSTRACT </span></h2> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">This deposit contains the complete empirical simulation framework for validating the structural immunity of the S-KERNEL V3 architecture (NC/SP V3, Blida V3 Standard) against large-scale cyber-attacks.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">The package includes:</span></p> <ul> <li> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">standard_datacenter_attack_simulation.c : a realistic simulation of a traditional security stack (AV, EDR, IPS, SIEM, Firewall) facing 10,000 concurrent attacks.</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">v3_datacenter_attack_simulation.c : a deterministic, lock-free, NUMA-aware simulation of the S-KERNEL V3 sovereign kernel under identical threat conditions.</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">v3_datacenter_simulation_report.pdf : the accompanying scientific report detailing the protocol, mitigation mapping, and zero-breach result.</span></p> </li> </ul> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">Experimental results show a 100.00% mitigation rate for S-KERNEL V3 across all six attack classes (buffer overflow, shellcode injection, privilege escalation, DoS saturation, log falsification, ransomware). The traditional stack exhibits measurable breach rates and false positives.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">The simulation is fully deterministic, multi-threaded, and compatible with Linux/POSIX environments. It requires no external libraries other than pthread and standard C.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">Keywords: NC/SP V3, S-KERNEL, Blida Standard, structural immunity, cyber-attack simulation, deterministic kernel, nuclear rollback, Lyapunov stability, Landauer limit, zero breach.</span></p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20413143 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Empirical Comparison of Standard Security Stack (AV/EDR/IPS/SIEM) vs S-KERNEL V3 (NC/SP V3) Under 10,000 Concurrent Cyber-Attacks – V3 Benchmark benhadid, OUTAIL NC/SP V3, S-KERNEL, Blida Standard, structural immunity, cyber-attack simulation, deterministic kernel, nuclear rollback, Lyapunov stability, Landauer limit, zero breach, buffer overflow mitigation, ransomware neutralization, NUMA sharding, heptadic cycle. <h2><span class="">ABSTRACT </span></h2> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">This deposit contains the complete empirical simulation framework for validating the structural immunity of the S-KERNEL V3 architecture (NC/SP V3, Blida V3 Standard) against large-scale cyber-attacks.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">The package includes:</span></p> <ul> <li> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">standard_datacenter_attack_simulation.c : a realistic simulation of a traditional security stack (AV, EDR, IPS, SIEM, Firewall) facing 10,000 concurrent attacks.</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">v3_datacenter_attack_simulation.c : a deterministic, lock-free, NUMA-aware simulation of the S-KERNEL V3 sovereign kernel under identical threat conditions.</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">v3_datacenter_simulation_report.pdf : the accompanying scientific report detailing the protocol, mitigation mapping, and zero-breach result.</span></p> </li> </ul> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">Experimental results show a 100.00% mitigation rate for S-KERNEL V3 across all six attack classes (buffer overflow, shellcode injection, privilege escalation, DoS saturation, log falsification, ransomware). The traditional stack exhibits measurable breach rates and false positives.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">The simulation is fully deterministic, multi-threaded, and compatible with Linux/POSIX environments. It requires no external libraries other than pthread and standard C.</span></p> <p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span class="">Keywords: NC/SP V3, S-KERNEL, Blida Standard, structural immunity, cyber-attack simulation, deterministic kernel, nuclear rollback, Lyapunov stability, Landauer limit, zero breach.</span></p> |
| title | Empirical Comparison of Standard Security Stack (AV/EDR/IPS/SIEM) vs S-KERNEL V3 (NC/SP V3) Under 10,000 Concurrent Cyber-Attacks – V3 Benchmark |
| topic | NC/SP V3, S-KERNEL, Blida Standard, structural immunity, cyber-attack simulation, deterministic kernel, nuclear rollback, Lyapunov stability, Landauer limit, zero breach, buffer overflow mitigation, ransomware neutralization, NUMA sharding, heptadic cycle. |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20413143 |