Dolichoiulus Verhoeff 1900
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901602063876096 |
|---|---|
| author | Enghoff, Henrik |
| author_facet | Enghoff, Henrik |
| contents | <p><b>Genus <i>Dolichoiulus</i> Verhoeff, 1900</b></p><p><i>Dolichoiulus</i> Verhoeff, 1900: 85.</p><p><i>Nesopachyiulus</i> Attems, 1902: 599, 607.</p><p><i>Trichopachyiulus</i> Verhoeff, 1910: 194.</p><p><i>Anagaiulus</i> Enghoff, 1992: 144 <b>syn. nov</b>.</p><p>See Enghoff (1992) for an in-depth discussion of <i>Dolichoiulus</i>. <i>Anagaiulus</i> was erected by Enghoff (1992) for a species which differs from the <i>Dolichoiulus</i> species in having a whorl of metazonital setae. Enghoff (1992) realized that this is a poor diagnostic character but preferred not to ‘dilute’ the already rather vague concept of <i>Dolichoiulus</i> by including a species with metazonital setae. Since then, two lines of evidence have emerged that contradict separate status for <i>Anagaiulus</i>:</p><p>One of the new species described in the present paper has metazonital setae; the other doesn’t, but 1. apart from this, and a size difference, the two species are as good as identical.</p><p>A preliminary molecular phylogenetic analysis by I. Sanmartín (unpublished) suggests that 2. <i>Anagaiulus</i> is nested deeply inside <i>Dolichoiulus</i>.</p><p><b>Diagnosis</b></p><p>(from Enghoff 1992, emended): Pachyiulini. Eyes present or absent. No frontal setae. Mostly without metazonital setae (exceptions: <i>D. blancatypa</i> (Enghoff, 1992) comb. nov. and <i>D. oromii</i> sp. nov.). Metazonital striae mostly distinct also dorsally. No grooves in suture. No (or almost no) preanal projection. Preanal pilosity marginal or extensive. Anal valve pilosity extensive. Male mandibles mostly without lobes. First and second male legs typically julid. Male legs mostly with ventral pads. Anterior gonopod spoon-shaped, with a mesal ridge, a lateral prominence, and two apical denticles (which may be fused or reduced). Posterior gonopod without a sperm fovea, with a mesomerital process and with two opisthomerital processes, posterior process varying from short-triangular to flagelliform; one or both opisthomerital processes sometimes more or less reduced.</p><p><b>Included species</b></p><p><i>Dolichoiulus blancatypa</i> (Enghoff, 1992), comb. nov. ex <i>Anagaiulus, D. typhlocanaria</i> sp. nov., <i>D. oromii</i> sp. nov., <i>D. longunguis</i> sp. nov., plus the 56 species included in Enghoff (1992).</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_3858582 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Dolichoiulus Verhoeff 1900 Enghoff, Henrik Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Diplopoda Julida Julidae Dolichoiulus <p><b>Genus <i>Dolichoiulus</i> Verhoeff, 1900</b></p><p><i>Dolichoiulus</i> Verhoeff, 1900: 85.</p><p><i>Nesopachyiulus</i> Attems, 1902: 599, 607.</p><p><i>Trichopachyiulus</i> Verhoeff, 1910: 194.</p><p><i>Anagaiulus</i> Enghoff, 1992: 144 <b>syn. nov</b>.</p><p>See Enghoff (1992) for an in-depth discussion of <i>Dolichoiulus</i>. <i>Anagaiulus</i> was erected by Enghoff (1992) for a species which differs from the <i>Dolichoiulus</i> species in having a whorl of metazonital setae. Enghoff (1992) realized that this is a poor diagnostic character but preferred not to ‘dilute’ the already rather vague concept of <i>Dolichoiulus</i> by including a species with metazonital setae. Since then, two lines of evidence have emerged that contradict separate status for <i>Anagaiulus</i>:</p><p>One of the new species described in the present paper has metazonital setae; the other doesn’t, but 1. apart from this, and a size difference, the two species are as good as identical.</p><p>A preliminary molecular phylogenetic analysis by I. Sanmartín (unpublished) suggests that 2. <i>Anagaiulus</i> is nested deeply inside <i>Dolichoiulus</i>.</p><p><b>Diagnosis</b></p><p>(from Enghoff 1992, emended): Pachyiulini. Eyes present or absent. No frontal setae. Mostly without metazonital setae (exceptions: <i>D. blancatypa</i> (Enghoff, 1992) comb. nov. and <i>D. oromii</i> sp. nov.). Metazonital striae mostly distinct also dorsally. No grooves in suture. No (or almost no) preanal projection. Preanal pilosity marginal or extensive. Anal valve pilosity extensive. Male mandibles mostly without lobes. First and second male legs typically julid. Male legs mostly with ventral pads. Anterior gonopod spoon-shaped, with a mesal ridge, a lateral prominence, and two apical denticles (which may be fused or reduced). Posterior gonopod without a sperm fovea, with a mesomerital process and with two opisthomerital processes, posterior process varying from short-triangular to flagelliform; one or both opisthomerital processes sometimes more or less reduced.</p><p><b>Included species</b></p><p><i>Dolichoiulus blancatypa</i> (Enghoff, 1992), comb. nov. ex <i>Anagaiulus, D. typhlocanaria</i> sp. nov., <i>D. oromii</i> sp. nov., <i>D. longunguis</i> sp. nov., plus the 56 species included in Enghoff (1992).</p> |
| title | Dolichoiulus Verhoeff 1900 |
| topic | Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Diplopoda Julida Julidae Dolichoiulus |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3858582 |