Feedback on: Kaur B, Rowe BH, Arnold E. Vitamin C supplementation for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD000993.
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2009
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866902305498988544 |
|---|---|
| author | Hemilä, Harri |
| author_facet | Hemilä, Harri |
| contents | <p>This is Feedback on the following Cochrane review: Kaur B, Rowe BH, Arnold E. Vitamin C supplementation for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD000993. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19160185">pubmed/19160185</a> doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000993.pub3">10.1002/14651858.CD000993.pub3</a></p> <p>This Feedback was published within the Cochrane review, see: <a href="https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/296440">https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/296440</a></p> <p>The first version of the Cochrane review was published in 2001: Kaur B, Rowe BH, Ram FS. Vitamin C supplementation for asthma.<br>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD000993. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11687089">pubmed/11687089</a><br>The second version of the Cochrane review was published in 2004: Ram FS, Rowe BH, Kaur B. Vitamin C supplementation for asthma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD000993. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15266435">pubmed/15266435</a></p> <p>This Feedback below points out errors in Analyses 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.5 of the Cochrane review (2009 version). However, all these analyses were identical already in the first version (2001) of the Cochrane review. Thus, because of the errors described in this feedback, the Cochrane review “Vitamin C supplementation for asthma” had been misleading readers for a decade.</p> <p>In addition to the problems described in this Feedback (2009) below, there are a number of additional problems in the Cochrane review “vitamin C supplementation for asthma” (2009), which are described in: <a href="https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/40816">https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/40816</a> with a copy at <a href="../doi/10.5281/zenodo.6405803">Zenodo</a>.</p> <p>Correction of the errors was a confusing process and briefly described in: Hemilä H. Cochrane has not consistently followed the COPE guidelines. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50(4):e13216. <a href="../doi/10.5281/zenodo.6405803">https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13216</a> <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10138/326823">https://hdl.handle.net/10138/326823 </a> </p> <p> </p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_6405776 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Feedback on: Kaur B, Rowe BH, Arnold E. Vitamin C supplementation for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD000993. Hemilä, Harri asthma; Cochrane review; exercise-induced bronchoconstriction; meta-analysis; vitamin C <p>This is Feedback on the following Cochrane review: Kaur B, Rowe BH, Arnold E. Vitamin C supplementation for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD000993. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19160185">pubmed/19160185</a> doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000993.pub3">10.1002/14651858.CD000993.pub3</a></p> <p>This Feedback was published within the Cochrane review, see: <a href="https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/296440">https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/296440</a></p> <p>The first version of the Cochrane review was published in 2001: Kaur B, Rowe BH, Ram FS. Vitamin C supplementation for asthma.<br>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD000993. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11687089">pubmed/11687089</a><br>The second version of the Cochrane review was published in 2004: Ram FS, Rowe BH, Kaur B. Vitamin C supplementation for asthma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD000993. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15266435">pubmed/15266435</a></p> <p>This Feedback below points out errors in Analyses 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.5 of the Cochrane review (2009 version). However, all these analyses were identical already in the first version (2001) of the Cochrane review. Thus, because of the errors described in this feedback, the Cochrane review “Vitamin C supplementation for asthma” had been misleading readers for a decade.</p> <p>In addition to the problems described in this Feedback (2009) below, there are a number of additional problems in the Cochrane review “vitamin C supplementation for asthma” (2009), which are described in: <a href="https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/40816">https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/40816</a> with a copy at <a href="../doi/10.5281/zenodo.6405803">Zenodo</a>.</p> <p>Correction of the errors was a confusing process and briefly described in: Hemilä H. Cochrane has not consistently followed the COPE guidelines. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50(4):e13216. <a href="../doi/10.5281/zenodo.6405803">https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13216</a> <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10138/326823">https://hdl.handle.net/10138/326823 </a> </p> <p> </p> |
| title | Feedback on: Kaur B, Rowe BH, Arnold E. Vitamin C supplementation for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD000993. |
| topic | asthma; Cochrane review; exercise-induced bronchoconstriction; meta-analysis; vitamin C |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6405776 |