Coptobrycon Gery 1966

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Langeani, Francisco, Serra, Jane Piton
Format: Recurso digital
Published: Zenodo 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901601924415488
author Langeani, Francisco
Serra, Jane Piton
author_facet Langeani, Francisco
Serra, Jane Piton
contents <p><b><i>Coptobrycon</i> Géry, 1966</b></p><p><b>Figs. 1-7</b></p><p><i>Coptobrycon</i> Géry, 1966: 226</p><p>(type-species: <i>Hasemania bilineata</i> Ellis, 1911, by original designation and monotypy).</p><p><b>Diagnosis.</b> <i>Coptobrycon</i> is easily distinguished from all other Characidae due to: a very peculiar dentary dentition, with only three, large, anterior, multicuspid and pedunculated, principal teeth in each half of the dentary (Fig. 5; <i>vs</i>. four or more conical or cuspidate and not pedunculated teeth, except in the Cheirodontinae and Iguanodectinae, which have more than four pedunculated teeth); the absence of the nasal bone (<i>vs</i>. present); the presence of a straight, dark brown stripe slightly above the base of the anal fin (Fig. 1), from vertical through its origin or slightly behind, continuing through the ventral portion of the caudal peduncle up to the base of the caudal fin (<i>vs</i>. absent). Furthermore, it can also be separated from all other Characidae, except <i>Grundulus</i>, by having the nasal pores separated by a non confluent space (Fig. 2; <i>vs</i>. nasal pores very close and confluent); infraorbitals 4 and 6 (5, sometimes) absent (Fig. 4; <i>vs</i>. present); infraorbital laterosensory canal greatly reduced, with pores inconspicuous or absent (Fig. 4; <i>vs</i>. present); supraorbital laterosensory canal absent in posterior portion of the frontal (<i>vs</i>. present). Other useful diagnostic characters include: up to six olfactory rosette lamellae, turned to the posterior portion of the nasal canal (Fig. 3; <i>vs</i>. more than ten lamellae, generally more than fifteen, concentrically arranged; except in <i>Grundulus</i> and <i>Xenurobrycon</i>); adipose fin absent (Fig. 1; <i>vs</i>. present; except in <i>Grundulus</i>, <i>Gymnocharacinus bergi</i>, <i>Hasemania</i>, some <i>Hyphessobrycon</i> species, and <i>Spintherobolus</i>).</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_6493718
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2010
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Coptobrycon Gery 1966
Langeani, Francisco
Serra, Jane Piton
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Characiformes
Characidae
Coptobrycon
<p><b><i>Coptobrycon</i> Géry, 1966</b></p><p><b>Figs. 1-7</b></p><p><i>Coptobrycon</i> Géry, 1966: 226</p><p>(type-species: <i>Hasemania bilineata</i> Ellis, 1911, by original designation and monotypy).</p><p><b>Diagnosis.</b> <i>Coptobrycon</i> is easily distinguished from all other Characidae due to: a very peculiar dentary dentition, with only three, large, anterior, multicuspid and pedunculated, principal teeth in each half of the dentary (Fig. 5; <i>vs</i>. four or more conical or cuspidate and not pedunculated teeth, except in the Cheirodontinae and Iguanodectinae, which have more than four pedunculated teeth); the absence of the nasal bone (<i>vs</i>. present); the presence of a straight, dark brown stripe slightly above the base of the anal fin (Fig. 1), from vertical through its origin or slightly behind, continuing through the ventral portion of the caudal peduncle up to the base of the caudal fin (<i>vs</i>. absent). Furthermore, it can also be separated from all other Characidae, except <i>Grundulus</i>, by having the nasal pores separated by a non confluent space (Fig. 2; <i>vs</i>. nasal pores very close and confluent); infraorbitals 4 and 6 (5, sometimes) absent (Fig. 4; <i>vs</i>. present); infraorbital laterosensory canal greatly reduced, with pores inconspicuous or absent (Fig. 4; <i>vs</i>. present); supraorbital laterosensory canal absent in posterior portion of the frontal (<i>vs</i>. present). Other useful diagnostic characters include: up to six olfactory rosette lamellae, turned to the posterior portion of the nasal canal (Fig. 3; <i>vs</i>. more than ten lamellae, generally more than fifteen, concentrically arranged; except in <i>Grundulus</i> and <i>Xenurobrycon</i>); adipose fin absent (Fig. 1; <i>vs</i>. present; except in <i>Grundulus</i>, <i>Gymnocharacinus bergi</i>, <i>Hasemania</i>, some <i>Hyphessobrycon</i> species, and <i>Spintherobolus</i>).</p>
title Coptobrycon Gery 1966
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Characiformes
Characidae
Coptobrycon
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6493718