Cita APA (7a ed.)

Wang, X., Pickett, W., Hutcheon, M., Prasankumar, R., & Zurek, E. (2024). Why Mg$_2$IrH$_6$ is predicted to be a high temperature superconductor, but Ca$_2$IrH$_6$ is not.

Cita Chicago Style (17a ed.)

Wang, Xiaoyu, Warren Pickett, Micheal Hutcheon, Rohit Prasankumar, y Eva Zurek. Why Mg$_2$IrH$_6$ Is Predicted to Be a High Temperature Superconductor, but Ca$_2$IrH$_6$ Is Not. 2024.

Cita MLA (9a ed.)

Wang, Xiaoyu, et al. Why Mg$_2$IrH$_6$ Is Predicted to Be a High Temperature Superconductor, but Ca$_2$IrH$_6$ Is Not. 2024.