Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23123 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866910247468138496 |
|---|---|
| author | Miranda, John Paul P. Parreño, Emmanuel B. Rivera, Jovita G. |
| author_facet | Miranda, John Paul P. Parreño, Emmanuel B. Rivera, Jovita G. |
| contents | The integration of AI tools in academic settings has introduced a distinct form of strain that existing frameworks like technostress and digital fatigue have not yet fully addressed. This study develops a conceptual model and identifies the dimensions that define AI fatigue as a form of strain arising from sustained academic use of AI tools. Using grounded theory analysis of open-ended responses from 1,054 university students across three universities in the Philippines, the study examined the cognitive, motivational, emotional, physical, and attentional pressures students experienced during AI-supported academic work. Analysis produced five dimensions of AI fatigue, namely Cognitive Overload, Motivational Disengagement, Moral Unease, Physical Strain, and Attentional Drift, each consisting of two indicators grounded in participant accounts. The findings also yielded the AI Fatigue Model, a stage-based framework that explains how these pressures accumulate and reinforce one another across repeated AI interaction in academic tasks. These contributions establish a conceptual and exploratory foundation for AI fatigue as a distinct construct and provide a basis for future instrument validation, scale development, and cross-contextual inquiry in academic settings where AI now mediates student learning. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_23123 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Defining AI Fatigue in Academic Contexts: Dimensions, Indicators, and a Stage-Based Model Using Grounded Theory Miranda, John Paul P. Parreño, Emmanuel B. Rivera, Jovita G. Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Human-Computer Interaction The integration of AI tools in academic settings has introduced a distinct form of strain that existing frameworks like technostress and digital fatigue have not yet fully addressed. This study develops a conceptual model and identifies the dimensions that define AI fatigue as a form of strain arising from sustained academic use of AI tools. Using grounded theory analysis of open-ended responses from 1,054 university students across three universities in the Philippines, the study examined the cognitive, motivational, emotional, physical, and attentional pressures students experienced during AI-supported academic work. Analysis produced five dimensions of AI fatigue, namely Cognitive Overload, Motivational Disengagement, Moral Unease, Physical Strain, and Attentional Drift, each consisting of two indicators grounded in participant accounts. The findings also yielded the AI Fatigue Model, a stage-based framework that explains how these pressures accumulate and reinforce one another across repeated AI interaction in academic tasks. These contributions establish a conceptual and exploratory foundation for AI fatigue as a distinct construct and provide a basis for future instrument validation, scale development, and cross-contextual inquiry in academic settings where AI now mediates student learning. |
| title | Defining AI Fatigue in Academic Contexts: Dimensions, Indicators, and a Stage-Based Model Using Grounded Theory |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23123 |