Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
1986
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED277390 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867180716174868480 |
|---|---|
| author | Garland, Kathleen Rike, Galen E. |
| author_facet | Garland, Kathleen Rike, Galen E. Garland, Kathleen Rike, Galen E. |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | The Relationship between Scholarly Productivity and Selected Institutional-Level and Individual-Level Variables: A Study of Library and Information Science Faculty Teaching in American Library Association Accredited Programs. Final Report. Garland, Kathleen Rike, Galen E. College Faculty College Programs Degrees (Academic) Faculty Publishing Faculty Workload Higher Education Information Science Library Education Library Schools Library Science Questionnaires Regression (Statistics) Surveys To determine the relationship between scholarly publication of faculty teaching in American Library Association accredited programs of library and information science and selected individual-level and institutional-level variables, a stratified proportional random sample was taken of 182 faculty members listed in the 1984 "Association for Library and Information Science Education Directory." Usable data were collected from 168 individuals via questionnaires, faculty vitae, online databases, and standard biographical and reference sources. Stepwise logistic regression and chi square analyses were used to determine which variables, or combinations thereof, relate most strongly to scholarly publication. The two related individual-level variables are highest degree earned and number of years elapsed from bachelor's degree to highest degree earned, and the four institutional-level variables are program type, size of faculty, prestige of program, and teaching load. It is concluded that these findings have implications for accreditation of library and information science programs, planning faculty development, and determining tenure, and that they should be of interest to persons seeking faculty positions in library and information science programs. Results of the study are illustrated in 15 figures, and a Scholarly Productivity Study questionnaire, code sheet, and faculty data sheet are appended. References and a bibliography are also included. (KM) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_ED277390 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 1986 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | The Relationship between Scholarly Productivity and Selected Institutional-Level and Individual-Level Variables: A Study of Library and Information Science Faculty Teaching in American Library Association Accredited Programs. Final Report. Garland, Kathleen Rike, Galen E. College Faculty College Programs Degrees (Academic) Faculty Publishing Faculty Workload Higher Education Information Science Library Education Library Schools Library Science Questionnaires Regression (Statistics) Surveys The Relationship between Scholarly Productivity and Selected Institutional-Level and Individual-Level Variables: A Study of Library and Information Science Faculty Teaching in American Library Association Accredited Programs. Final Report. Garland, Kathleen Rike, Galen E. College Faculty College Programs Degrees (Academic) Faculty Publishing Faculty Workload Higher Education Information Science Library Education Library Schools Library Science Questionnaires Regression (Statistics) Surveys To determine the relationship between scholarly publication of faculty teaching in American Library Association accredited programs of library and information science and selected individual-level and institutional-level variables, a stratified proportional random sample was taken of 182 faculty members listed in the 1984 "Association for Library and Information Science Education Directory." Usable data were collected from 168 individuals via questionnaires, faculty vitae, online databases, and standard biographical and reference sources. Stepwise logistic regression and chi square analyses were used to determine which variables, or combinations thereof, relate most strongly to scholarly publication. The two related individual-level variables are highest degree earned and number of years elapsed from bachelor's degree to highest degree earned, and the four institutional-level variables are program type, size of faculty, prestige of program, and teaching load. It is concluded that these findings have implications for accreditation of library and information science programs, planning faculty development, and determining tenure, and that they should be of interest to persons seeking faculty positions in library and information science programs. Results of the study are illustrated in 15 figures, and a Scholarly Productivity Study questionnaire, code sheet, and faculty data sheet are appended. References and a bibliography are also included. (KM) |
| title | The Relationship between Scholarly Productivity and Selected Institutional-Level and Individual-Level Variables: A Study of Library and Information Science Faculty Teaching in American Library Association Accredited Programs. Final Report. |
| topic | College Faculty College Programs Degrees (Academic) Faculty Publishing Faculty Workload Higher Education Information Science Library Education Library Schools Library Science Questionnaires Regression (Statistics) Surveys |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED277390 |